Inherit the Wind is the prototype for Hollywood's leftist propaganda. Even in my adolescent atheist days I found this mo
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Inherit the Wind
mimosa_mirabella — 12 years ago(October 11, 2013 12:32 PM)
Inherit the Wind is the prototype for Hollywood's leftist propaganda. Even in my adolescent atheist days I found this movie repellently 'melodramatic. Repeated viewings haven't made me like it better. Thank goodness Fredric March and Spencer Tracy shown brightly in better pictures during their latter years.
Hollyweirdos hate religion but have mastered
http://vincentandmorticiasspeakeasy14846.yuku.com/directory -
ScreenwriterVA — 12 years ago(October 11, 2013 10:15 PM)
Scary how the issues are the same today as in 1925, almost a hundred years ago. Creationism must be taught in the schools! Science and religion are incompatible! If you believe in God, you believe that he gave us reason, so why are re rejecting reason in favor of the unsustainable belief in an infallible book? This kind of reactionary "Christian" faith is why the Tea Party in Congress has led to a government shutdown. My way or the highway. Will we never learn?
-
russedav — 12 years ago(October 19, 2013 07:34 AM)
See www.creation.com for an exhaustive refutation of your sad confusion that tragically enslaves most today, Christian or not, binding them into scientific incompetence that always entails those who abandon and reject truth for evolution's bigoted and groundless antitheist lies. Like the "anthropocentric global warming" fraud, evolution's only done for $ sex & power, controlling the microphone lest the creationists expose "The Emporor's New Clothes" nakedness of antitheist chicanery that enslaved Nazi Germany & the USSR the creationist West defeated before it finally overcame and destroyed the west too.
-
jeromec-2 — 12 years ago(February 08, 2014 09:13 PM)
I often wish I had more biology and less physics and math. This is one of those times.
I find it odd that no one has mentioned who Darwin was, who his wife was, and what history there was in the publication of his findings. I cannot counter what those of you very knowledgeable about chromosome theory have said. I find it commendable that you can even talk about such things and anyone who believes in the literal truth of the Bible has to deal with the chromosome issue has to delve into the scientific evidence offered by those people who bring up these arguments.
Darwin himself was a trained theologian. His wife was extremely religious and not stupidly so. Their marriage was such that he would not consider publishing his findings without her consent. Even so, his method was painstakingly thorough and he tried very hard to keep God out of it. Darwin's wife Emma gave her consent because she saw clearly what he (Darwin) was trying to do. It was a very fine line that he was walking.
Many religious scientists who believe deeply in God (Newton for one, Faraday for another, Maxwell for a third) try and keep God out of their "equations" and stick to observable facts. What they found did not shake their religious beliefs at all. That's true of Newton, Faraday and Maxwell. I'm not sure about Darwin, since he seemed to have questions before publishing his Biological material. His wife never faltered and never developed any doubt that I know of.