In the novel (spoiler)
-
MissMargoChanning — 5 years ago(April 20, 2020 04:30 PM)
Sad but true.
You don't know it, but you just gave me a little nudge. I just perused my book shelf. I found it! While I have viewed the film many times… even just recently, I haven't read the story in years. It's time.
Thanks for the nudge.
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.
Fasten Your Seatbelts….
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night! -
Karl Aksel — 5 years ago(April 21, 2020 07:29 AM)
Now days? Limbs are torn off and heads roll as the blood flows. No big deal
You had that back then, too. I remember an old interview Christopher Lee did in German, I think right after his role in Captain Invincible (1983), and he was asked what he thought of modern horror films. He didn't like them all that much, because "these days" you could see everything. Blood, gore, the lot. (As if one couldn't see that in the Hammer films he starred in.)
Graphic butchery of the human body in film goes back at least as far as 1916, and the '70s and '80s were chock-full of it. Guts being torn out, eyes being poked out, heads being chopped off, skulls being crushed, chests being ripped open… You name it, it was there back then as well. And people back then were also complaining about "what are movies coming to". But the fact is, those graphic depictions have always catered to a certain niche, which is why we only see such gore in certain kinds of movies. Gore has never been "no big deal" in mainstream movies, and it isn't today either. Movies like Hostel, I Spit On Your Grave (which is a remake of a 1978 revenge-porn with virtually identical action) etc. are not movies for everyone, and the gore displayed there would be met with loud protests had they appeared in a
regular
action or drama.
Just like we have a lot more porn these days - but you still don't see porn in regular movies.
Sometimes
you see unsimulated sex in mainstream movies, but that happens just as rarely today as it did decades ago. Caligula, anyone? -
MissMargoChanning — 5 years ago(April 21, 2020 12:20 PM)
As the years have passed, they have perfected it.
One other thing…
The blood and guts and the sex became more readily available and accessable with the advent of the VCR.
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.
Fasten Your Seatbelts….
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night! -
Cerridwen — 5 years ago(April 20, 2020 06:20 PM)
Violence in film really escalated shockingly quickly between the 60s and 70s. We evolved from cartoonish, rubber-knifed shower stabbings to crucifix masturbation in
The Exorcist
, revenge-based torture porn through
I Spit On Your Grave
, and head-decapitating, leg-severing, halved-man chewing monsters via
Jaws
.
Hark! Harold the angel sings. -
Platonic_Caveman — 5 years ago(April 21, 2020 07:33 AM)
Plus Hitchcock played up the shower scene for its sexuality - a wet beautiful naked woman. A decapitation would have meant too much unnecessary gore.
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy -
MissMargoChanning — 5 years ago(April 24, 2020 01:48 PM)
He was an interesting choice for the role in the film. The complete opposite of the Norman in the written story.
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.
Fasten Your Seatbelts….
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night! -
MissMargoChanning — 5 years ago(April 24, 2020 02:38 PM)
Reading the book again also made me realize that Sam wasn't as nice as he was in the movie. Sam seemed to have a bit of a roving eye in the book. It was just a subtle thing. The 90s movie also picked up on that.
What I mean, is that he didn't really seem to be as into Mary as Mary was into him.
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.
Fasten Your Seatbelts….
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night!
