My 7-year-old has managed to persuade me into letting him see a Bond-movie. I don't know the movies very well, so I coul
-
psychocosmic-1 — 10 years ago(May 25, 2015 02:57 AM)
I hope that you, father of your child, are prepared to explain the "love them, waste them" philosophy that exists in almost every Bondfilm. Sex should be beautiful between two persons, but what do you say to a 7 yr old boy who hasnt had sex when Bond shags 3 or 4 women per film?
-
mobile-707 — 10 years ago(May 26, 2015 08:03 AM)
The entire pop-entertainment universe of 2015 (movies, TV, magazines, books, websites, apps, etc.) is about 90% filth. In the overall scheme of things today, an old Bond-movie is about as subversive and corrupting as a lump of reheated oatmeal. But with that said, yes I would try to discourage any 7-year-old from watching the 007 films.
A few years ago, a friend asked me to take her 12-year-old son to see Quantum of Solace. (He was anxious to see it; she had zero interest). I remember thinking that QOS was a little too intense for a 12y/o, but if the boy's own mother was okay with it -
psychocosmic-1 — 10 years ago(May 26, 2015 11:32 AM)
Thanks for replying, mobile-707! Its not easy where to put a border limit with things, kids are different evolved, and you are probably right about the kids are quite jaded, (Porn was legalized when I was seven and pornmags was thrown in bushes and places for kids to accidentally see (Sweden!)but I rather let the seven year old see tits and naked women except for sexscenes, than people switching bedpartners and sometimes kill them
-
Michael71 — 10 years ago(January 05, 2016 03:19 AM)
I'd say 7 is maybe a bit young. maybe wait until he's a bit older, say 13 onwards. There is quite a bit of violence in this, and flashes of nudity as well. Plus I used to find these boring when I was as a kid so he probably wouldn't appreciate them until he was older anyway.
-
wallacesawyer — 10 years ago(February 03, 2016 06:19 PM)
I don't know what age I was, but DR NO, GOLDFINGER, FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE, and MOONRAKER are probably the oldest Bond films I remember seeing in my youth. And to this day they're still among my favorites. Opinions differ in regards to the Bond films. I grew up during the Brosnan years, but I prefer the films of Connery, Moore, and Dalton.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/ -
domester82 — 10 years ago(March 19, 2016 02:12 PM)
I always loved the Bond series since I was about 11 years old (I am now 33, born in '82)
I found Dr No and From Russia With Love a bit boring when I was a teen, but I love them now as an adult. The action is a little more tame than in later films in the series. The films are more of a slow burn, and might be a tad too slow paced for some of today's kids.
However, even when i was a kid in the 1990s, I LOVED Goldfinger. It was action packed. Goldfinger set the template for the Bond films to come, and for action cinema in general to come. Goldfinger could be a better place to start for a kid.
The sex references went over my head as a pre teen. -
KingCobra686 — 10 years ago(March 19, 2016 04:01 PM)
My parents let my siblings and I watch all of the 007 films. I never found them to be too much. The movies have a lot more action than they do violence. I dont think there is any real nudity in the series, and the intimate series are always kept very PG.
The Craig movies are a bit more realistic and graphic when it comes to the violence, so I dont know if I would start with those. -
sasya — 9 years ago(June 07, 2016 11:02 AM)
Thank you for all your helpful comments.
I ended up watching Moonraker and my kid was certainly captivated and didn't find it dull or dated. He did wonder at Bond killing the minor bad guys in an off-hand way without really knowing how bad they really were. For my own part, I didn't like this cavalier attitude towards human lives, but even more grating was the portrayal of the women. I think I'll screen one of the newer ones alone and see what I think in a year or two.
Everyone is different, and I'm sure others feel differently. At least I'd say that a modern kid can still feel the thrill of the Jaws scenes and enjoy the movie as a whole, though he couldn't really follow the plot.
Thanks again! -
crood — 9 years ago(August 25, 2016 07:04 AM)
Probably a good choice. While not very well regarded, it's probably not a bad entry point for a modern youth with all the space stuff and special effects. However, even for the Moore era, it's atypical.
I'd have suggested The Spy Who Loved Me. It's one of the better Moore films, but hearkens back to much of the Connery era. It had a good bad guy, Jaws, who was also in Moonraker. I was about 9 or 10 when I saw it in the theater with friends. PG meant something different then.
It has one of the best Bond cars of all time, the Lotus Espirit that becomes a submarine, still cool. It also had the first appearance of a water bike (JetSki, WaveRunner) before they went on sale. Not as cool today, but back then it was something we'd never seen before. -
TAFFman — 1 year ago(May 16, 2024 03:15 PM)
I was born in 1954. The first Bond film I saw was 'Dr. No', which I saw in a movie theater in 1964, when I was 10 years old. I loved it (and I still do). I think it was fine for me to see at 10. Incidentally, I've seen all of the Bond films; and Sean Connery has always been my favorite Bond.
I know there is a great diversity in personal taste; but I think 'Moonraker' is easily the WORST Bond film. I think it's rather too bad that you started with that one. But who knows, maybe all the silly jokes and space stuff in it was right for a 7 year old. But I hope that 'Moonraker' being his first Bond film doesn't cement his expectations for what Bond films ought to be. -
AnthonySocksss — 8 months ago(July 19, 2025 04:49 AM)
Moonraker is one of the BEST Bond movies.
Have you seen the Daniel Craig crapfests? They’d qualify as the worst.
Melton1 Wanted for Pedophilia:
https://i.ibb.co/6cnPmJVr/IMG-0830.jpg
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Zjxk307CND0 -
perfectpawn — 9 years ago(December 07, 2016 10:24 AM)
The first Bond I recall seeing was For Your Eyes Only; I was six, and it had just come on HBO. I remember liking it, but it wasn't until I was 11 that I got bitten by the Bond bug. I rented all the Connery movies on vhs and read all the John Gardner novels, as well as all the Flemings I could find. So anyway, I'd say 11 is a perfectly acceptable age to start in on the classic Bond franchiseif the kid is younger, maybe start him/her off with some of the Moore entries, perhaps Moonraker?
