Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Isn't THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY a prequel to the other two?

Isn't THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY a prequel to the other two?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
15 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — A Fistful of Dollars


    adamsherf — 16 years ago(June 23, 2009 08:13 PM)

    Isn't THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY a prequel to the other two?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        adamsherf — 16 years ago(June 25, 2009 09:21 PM)

        ha! that's interesting. Yeah, i thought maybe they were separate stories. I think i might watch em in reverse order Thanks for the info!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          smithc93 — 16 years ago(July 14, 2009 02:25 PM)

          Order of release:
          Fistfull of dollars: 1964
          For A Few Dollars More: 1965
          The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly: 1966

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            DC-Tiki — 16 years ago(August 09, 2009 05:17 AM)

            I think they are really seperate films and the Eastwood character isn't necessarily meant to be the same one as you saw in the other two films BUT if it really is a trilogy in the traditional sense I'd have to guess that
            Good, Bad & Ugly
            would be first on the simple basis that you see him pick up the trademark poncho after he leaves his jacket on the dying soldier.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              blaine-fuller — 16 years ago(August 26, 2009 01:35 AM)

              that makes sense. i agree with that.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                bigmac79-1 — 16 years ago(September 05, 2009 07:39 AM)

                And in Few, The Man with no name has no shotholes in his hat in the beginning. Than he gets two shots in it.
                In Fistful, the Hat has got these 2 Bulletholes.
                And the Poncho in The Good is the "proof" that this is the first one in the "Trilogy"
                Part 1: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly: 1966
                Part 2: For A Few Dollars More: 1965
                Part 3: Fistfull of dollars: 1964
                But has anybody from the makers ever said that Eastwoods Character is always the same?
                Van Cleefs isn't either.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  IMDb User

                  This message has been deleted.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    Fullhouser — 16 years ago(October 29, 2009 12:54 PM)

                    You do know that it does not matter if the same actors play different characters in the movies? when its about movies its about characters, you don't have lee van cleef in the next 2 movies, you have 1: Douglas Mortimer and 2: Angel Eyes.
                    So if you say that they have to be seperate movies because of that then your wrong.The Three movies are just stories envolving the same poncho wearing cigar smoking man with no name. It don't matter even when these three movies happen. the movies only connect thru the character played by Clint Eastwood now if that makes it a trilogy then it does. if not
                    Jake: She says he's pretty.
                    Joey: Yeah, well, you make him ugly.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      wtl471629 — 12 years ago(April 12, 2013 11:59 PM)

                      I think it is a prequel to the other two. This is discussed at The Good Bad and the Ugly IMDB board under the Prequel thread. Be sure to note the grave at the graveyard scene has 1873 on the tombstone in A Fistful of Dollars. Of course TGB&U takes place during the Civil War.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        IMDb User

                        This message has been deleted.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          holsty101 — 12 years ago(October 29, 2013 07:09 PM)

                          Chronological order does not necessarily mean order they were made in, dummy 😉

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            lathe-of-heaven — 12 years ago(November 23, 2013 08:46 PM)

                            'Dummy'???
                            Really?!
                            I have over 5000 films, many of them very rare and OOP. I LOVE to trade. PLEASE ASK!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              movie_nazi — 11 years ago(December 27, 2014 12:30 AM)

                              There is no order because Eastwood plays different characters in all the films. Why is this so hard for people to grasp?
                              My Vote history:
                              http://www.imdb.com/user/ur1914996/ratings

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                IMDb User

                                This message has been deleted.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups