Why didn't they eat the camel?
-
detroit442 — 20 years ago(October 15, 2005 02:25 PM)
One drawback to that. If the camel was also dehydrated, you would not get very much ahead and may well be worse off. Blood is very salty tasting and very close chemically to seawater. They could have fed the monkey salt and when thirst was driving him mad, let him loose and IF there was any water around, the monkey would find it. I saw that done on Animals are Beautiful people. It appeared to me to be a reliable source I would bet my life on.
-
tomcat69w — 20 years ago(January 04, 2006 07:20 PM)
I saw this when it first came out (hate the remake) My take on it is more psychological. Stewart's character felt responsible for their fate,he saw the lame Camel croaking in pain as what was to become of him and the others. He 'lost it' and emptied the gun into the Camel.
The Smoker You Drink, The Player You Get! -
seraph766 — 19 years ago(May 19, 2006 07:25 PM)
Actually, in the book, after the Arabs had killed Harris and the doctor, Frank and Moran had gone out to examine the remains. Moran cut open the camel and took the fluid from inside its stomach. Apparently, he poured the stuff into the tank.
Later, Crow and Bellamy came back to scavenge the blood from the camel. -
alpha_1976 — 18 years ago(April 09, 2007 05:33 AM)
If the camel were not killed i would have said - may be to get some water later on!
We're talking about unchecked aggression here, dude.
http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=6221274 -
gaudette-788 — 16 years ago(May 13, 2009 01:31 PM)
Whatever you do, do not go see the remake of The Flight of The Pheonix! It sucked. Do not waste your time. You can go to see it like I did and compare it to the original, but don't expect it to be as powerful or intense as the original. Dennis Quaid's character doesn't even come close to Stewart.
Just some advice.