Oh! I could crush a grape!
-
bastasch8647 — 17 years ago(September 17, 2008 10:22 PM)
I never got the impression that they were hippies as that term came to connote in the late 60s. Sure, the film was made in 1966 and the Summer of Love was in 1967, but these folks seem more "Beat"-alternative than hippy-alternative, as if they're carrying more early 60s baggage than late 60s "true" hippieness.
Also, did anybody notice the brief shot of the "professor"-type guy in the sports coat and spectacles? I wonder if he was a Beat poet or someone influential in California's alternative society in the mid-60s. Looks vaguely familiar to me. -
bastasch8647 — 17 years ago(September 17, 2008 10:32 PM)
Also wanted to mention that I thought the bacchinal was extremely refreshing, non-lacivious, and documantary especially for a mainstream film of its time. Non-exploitive nudity and spontaneous celebration - all to underscore Arthur's uptight persona, and how it finally begins to change just a little - a fitting, non-intrusive set of images.
-
jameselliot-1 — 17 years ago(October 04, 2008 05:20 PM)
I never liked this jarring scene and I never really understood Rock's sudden transformation to experiencing ecstasy in the vat. He goes from demanding Salome leave the vat to being stripped and tossed in to sudden joy. It didn't work for me. If he is so transformed, then why does he freak out at the cocktail party and reject his new life? The best scene for me is the meeting between John Randolph and Jeff Corey. The entire movie is like an adult version of the original Twilight Zone and the Outer Limits. Brilliant.
-
podwilliams — 16 years ago(May 16, 2009 09:43 AM)
On a slightly tangential note, I'm still giggling at the title of this thread, or rather, at the unexpected juxtaposition between the catchphrase of a slightly camp, 1970s TV presenter (Stu Francis: "Ooh, I could crush a grape!") and a classic John Frankenheimer film. I never thought I'd see the day. It's
made
mine.
The lion and the calf shall lie down together, but the calf won't get much sleep. -
franzkabuki — 16 years ago(January 30, 2010 11:58 AM)
Well not really a minor problem - it was SO horrible it ruined almost the entire movie. At any rate stopped it dead on its track for some time. Couldnt they really find a less ridiculous way to showcase Wilsons inability to blend in and let go? The first act was perfect, awesome film-making, but things go pretty much downhill from the moment Rock Hudson appears. Neither the second party nor Wilsons home visit were handled quite as well as they couldve.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan -
Greg75 — 16 years ago(February 06, 2010 01:19 PM)
The grape crushing sequence might indeed seem quite endless, but it actually lasts 7'50", which is not THAT long. It's the relative improvisation feeling (as opposed to the rigid scriptwriting in the rest of the film) which probably gives that impression.
-
bon22 — 11 years ago(June 27, 2014 10:15 PM)
He goes from demanding Salome leave the vat to being stripped and tossed in to sudden joy.
At the end of the film, Tony says that his main problem was that he never knew what he truly wanted and he allowed others to tell him what he wanted & the bacchanal illustrates this problem: At first, he protests and resists, but he is ultimately forced to succumb and then he joyfully participates. He is forced to do what he doesn't want to do and then he seemingly enjoys it.
The bacchanal also illustrates that this character flaw enabled him to become a victim of the company: he never knew what he really wanted and he was easily pressured into doing things he didn't want to do. Since he was malleable, the company could persuade him to go along with the agenda. -
Woodyanders — 7 years ago(July 19, 2018 12:11 AM)
I thought the grape stomping scene was a very important moment in the film because it showed how difficult and awkward it was for Hamilton to assimilate into his new life as Wilson.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything. -
WarrenPeace — 1 year ago(January 05, 2025 03:46 PM)
Too long?
It wasn't long enough!
I wanted to watch those naked tits as much as possible!
If you think it was too long then you are a fag.
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall -
LorqVonRay1999 — 1 year ago(February 24, 2025 11:36 PM)
It's the only misstep in an otherwise fascinating, disturbing and well acted film. The scene is badly directed and edited and goes on too long. You could take it out of the film entirely and the film would only benefit.