Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Having not watched this film in probabaly 20 years I recorded it of a digial channel recently and at first thought it wa

Having not watched this film in probabaly 20 years I recorded it of a digial channel recently and at first thought it wa

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
1 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Charge of the Light Brigade


    Slime-3 — 9 years ago(November 16, 2016 03:25 PM)

    Having not watched this film in probabaly 20 years I recorded it of a digial channel recently and at first thought it was a really bad print - several spaghetti westerns shown on the same channel have used abysmal murky prints - however the image quality suddenly improved once the action shifted frm England to the Crimea. I note on the trivia section here that this was intentional! I have to say I am all for directors and DPs trying something different but in this case the strange narrow/shallow focus in many early scenes just looks like really poor workmanship rather than.wellwhatever it was supposed to be like. The edges of the frame are often cloudy , distorted and out of focus. The scene with Venessa Redgrave and David Hemmings walking under a canal bridge is entirely blurred. I guess the drector was suggesting something, maybe a misty-eyed, dreamy view of a lost (pre war) England?
    The film was a notorious fiancial failure on release and I can't help wondering if this was part of the reason the public just didn't take to it. The first hour just looks badly shot.
    Any thoughts on this?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups