1969? wow.
-
GameWithStones — 17 years ago(November 07, 2008 04:25 AM)
Props should also go to the British Film Institute, in the UKtheir release predated Criterion's by several months, and the two transfers are near identical. Criterion even used the fabulous commentary from the BFI edition.
-
praxis1966-1 — 16 years ago(September 25, 2009 11:07 AM)
Maybe I'm just showing my age, but I preferred the model planes, sort of in the same way I preferred the puppets and costumes of the original Star Wars trilogy to the newer CGI laden latter works. If I wanted to watch cartoons I'd rent Cars or Toy Story.
-
electricafroman — 15 years ago(August 09, 2010 12:12 AM)
thats the reason I'm here. '69 didn't sound right when i saw the date. besides the transfer the film seems to be shot in a more modern style
Oh dear. This calls for a very special blend of psychology and EXTREME VIOLENCE. -
Veritas_Lux_Mea — 12 years ago(April 16, 2013 05:46 AM)
Yes, this is one of the films that define Criterion for me. A film long buried gets a blu-ray release after decades and is discovered by so many people that otherwise would never have seen it. Fairly lousy that the Criterion version is now out of printStudio Canal is releasing their own versionand now it will be difficult or expensive for people that want to see it to track it down. Hopefully Studio Canal does a much better job with their version than they did with their own release of The Third Mananother out of print Criterion disc which far exceeded the Studio Canal version.