Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Bored out of my mind

Bored out of my mind

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
8 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Medium Cool


    edwardholub — 13 years ago(April 07, 2012 08:50 PM)

    I'm typing this while the movie is playing in my living room. Film has NO POINT, nothing. What's the big deal? Why is everyone so ga-ga about this movie?
    There is no "off" position on the genius switch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      milliesdad — 13 years ago(September 06, 2012 10:13 PM)

      Don't worry. I'm sure there's an Adam Sandler movie on somewhere.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        filmscholar35 — 12 years ago(May 14, 2013 05:03 AM)

        People who surf the internet or play on their phones during smart, character driven movies are always the ones who say the films are boring and pointless.
        WATCH and PAY ATTENTION to the film and you might understand it.
        But, then again, limited attention spans are all the rage now. If something's not blowing up in CGI every five seconds, the film is boring.
        But, oh, those Batman movies, now THERE'S art! Greatest movies in history, there

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          res_travis — 10 years ago(May 04, 2015 09:52 AM)

          C'mon guys, the OP has a point. This film has great archival value, but the fictional part of this film is simply lousy.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            joshua_carpino — 10 years ago(July 18, 2015 05:42 PM)

            "C'mon guys, the OP has a point."
            the OP shouldn't have watched this film in the first place.
            "This film has great archival value,"
            well, i'd rather watch it than put it in a safe somewhere.
            "but the fictional part of this film is simply lousy."
            no,it really isn't.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              ironskeletor — 9 years ago(July 21, 2016 05:23 PM)

              You could always articulate what about the film you liked. But I guess it's a lot easier to dismiss the OP as some troglodyte with ADD.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                fanaticita — 9 years ago(November 05, 2016 11:52 AM)

                I too agree with the OP. I didn't finish watching it because I felt like I was looking at somebody who was filming a film all the time. . . . .boring.
                As far as the 1960s are concerned. .. .. been there done that.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  Kompressor_Fan — 9 years ago(January 14, 2017 07:29 AM)

                  I don't have a short attention span, and I love movies that reveal their story slowly. That said, this film was like watching grass grow. It was well photographed.I'll give it that.but very poorly executed. Wexler is a great cimematographer, but he is no director. When you have a film that has a good central cast (Robert Forster, Verna Bloom, Marianne Hill, Peter Bonerz) and they are all giving performances that elicit eye rolling, then you know the problem is not with the actors.
                  It has some interest as a time capsule of a past time, but the interest pretty much ends there.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups