Did Cromwell become a bigger Dictator than King Charles I ?
-
Koncorde — 19 years ago(April 12, 2006 01:35 PM)
Charles was not offered 'absolute' monarchy. He was invited back because the alternative was to 'elect' a prime minister with no head of state or figurehead. Charles return lent legitimacy to Parliament, nothing more.
With regards to the first post and taxes - taxes are not the mode of a tyrant. His taxes paid for university's, schools, roads, the navy, the army etc and set Britain up as a European power (having previously under James, Charles etc practically 'lost' all bargaining power).
In addition the 'origin' of troubles in Ulster pre-date Cromwell by quite a margin. -
Errington_92 — 10 years ago(January 15, 2016 07:09 AM)
Ironically he embroiled the country in a war with Holland our closest Protestant neighbor.
It was not for religious reasons, rather for supremacy of the seas. This was for trading purposes, leading to the Commonwealth spreading their colonial influence in the Caribbean.
I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not.