I absolutely love Requiem, is Panic similar? What are the differences between the 2? And in yalls opinion which is the o
-
digitalbookworm5678 — 12 years ago(May 01, 2013 04:08 PM)
The big difference that nobody else mentioned here. There are no fancy special effects or hallucination sequences in Panic. Straightforward filmmaking at it's best. Not to put down Requiem, A great film in a different style.
It's only with the heart that one can see clearly. What's essential is invisible to the eye. -
KeiraVatt — 11 years ago(July 14, 2014 05:29 PM)
I truly liked both films. The acting was superior in both. Panic was gritty and real for the 70's. It is a must see for any fans of film, addiction, or the actors involved. Requiem (also a favorite of mine), as many posters have noted, was a well done and highly produced quick display of the ramifications of drug use. The film Panic takes its time. Either film is time not wasted.
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others WHENEVER they go. -
!!!deleted!!! (24175281) — 11 years ago(August 21, 2014 10:37 PM)
I'm not sure you really have to choose. I think it's really cool to watch both of them. Both are good and it's interesting to see the same subject matter done in different ways. 'Panic' has no musicfollows the same two people and is basically unresolved at the end in a way.
Requiem though is loud and disturbing and is more about addiction, less about a lifestyle.
Panic will leave you kind of frustrated and Requiem will leave you disturbed and sad.
Both are good!