Liberals Suck
-
justanicknamed — 10 years ago(July 22, 2015 11:14 AM)
Fuqk you, you fuqking retard. I just showed your questions and my answers. There was nothing vague about my answers; you are just trying to make them vague to make yourself feel big.
You asked twice, I gave two direct answers, and then you started in on the insults.
You really are retarded if you don't get that, and I'm done with you if you don't get. -
Culfy — 10 years ago(July 22, 2015 11:25 AM)
Yes you did. You made a vague suggestion that someone somewhere might have complained but it wasn't recorded (which would hardly be a cause for calling Liberals scum
And then went on to use the fact that there was no record of people complaining about Soap as proof of this - even though it took me a second to find a record of people complaining about Soap on the Internet
Ever tried. Ever failed. No Matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better -
justanicknamed — 10 years ago(July 22, 2015 11:31 AM)
Yes you did.
No. I didn't. I gave a direct answer and then I opined about the answer. I'm sorry that you are too stupid to understand it - especially since I opined after THE SECOND TIME IN ANSWERED THE QUESTION YOU JACK OFF.
which would hardly be a cause for calling Liberals scum
Which I didn't do, but being the anus licker you are, you threw out the insult at me.
And then went on to use the fact that there was no record of people complaining about Soap as proof of this - even though it took me a second to find a record of people complaining about Soap on the Internet
Psst. Retard. I said the results that show up on the first page of Google showed nothing about people TRYING TO BAN it, not just complaining about it.
You really are sh!t brained stupid. I thought I was done with this, but it is becoming fun again showing everyone how incredibly stupid you are.
You really aren't any good at this. -
Culfy — 10 years ago(July 22, 2015 11:51 AM)
You know, you'd have saved yourself a lot of aggravation at the beginning if you'd have said 'yes I agree with you - there's no evidence of anyone trying to ban Blazing Saddles therefore it's wrong to call Liberals scum'
Instead you went round the park trying to prove that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and if you search on a particular search string you don't find information about a particular show on the first page of results therefore I'm wrong.
Ever tried. Ever failed. No Matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better -
justanicknamed — 10 years ago(July 22, 2015 12:24 PM)
You asked a question, and I gave a direct answer. I won't apologize for you being a retard and not understanding that.
I'm wrong
Congratulations! You FINALLY got something right.
Now, fuqk off you retarded glory-hole drippings licker. -
DaytonaBob — 10 years ago(July 26, 2015 01:05 AM)
THE only tard here is YOU.
You started a thread by LYING. Didn't even try to prove anything but some lameazzed line like "It was before google therefore" blah blah blah.
Google can find anything that has been put on the site and that includes news articles going back a hundred years,
So just admit it, you are an idiot. Plain and simple
Oh and admit you lied.
They who give up liberty to
obtain a temporary safety deserve
neither liberty or safety -
coldnaps — 10 years ago(July 31, 2015 04:07 PM)
Just,have you and cuffy nothing better to do with your time than continue this lame-ass back and forth?. The OP is ab obvious teabagger moron troll, and both of you jumped on the bait. Nobody has tried to ban the film. The OP is a liar.
-
Culfy — 10 years ago(August 02, 2015 09:56 AM)
Your replies seemed to be 1) I couldn't find something on the first page of Google therefore it's not on the Internet 2) just because the greatest repository of knowledge ever in the history of human civilisation doesn't have mention of something that would have been a national scandal doesn't mean it didn't happen.
So are we playing again? Oh goody!
Ever tried. Ever failed. No Matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better