Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. All-Star Cast, but only 5.6.

All-Star Cast, but only 5.6.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
15 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    namaGemo — 13 years ago(November 12, 2012 08:56 AM)

    The movie was actually good, but it's dated. So, people watch it now and laugh at it, when it was just how things were back then. People might not think the effects are so great in this cgi generation, so they drop points for that, or they don't know who any of the cast was, so more dropped points.
    People have to give credit to a movie based on the merits for the time it was made, not how things are made now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      SnoozeAlarm — 13 years ago(December 09, 2012 02:10 PM)

      I really think you're totally wrong. This film is just awful on every level, production values, acting, pacing. Has absolutely nothing to do with the time it was made. I can think of hundreds of films made around the same time, or years, or even decades prior to this that are vastly superior.
      As an example, I'll choose Towering Inferno because it's from the same period, and it's the same genre. Can't compare the two films Inferno is so brilliant on every level, it puts this film so completely in a shadow.
      I cried because I had no shoes until I met a man with no sole.
      ~ Ancient Disco Proverb

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        rockmail — 13 years ago(January 02, 2013 01:54 PM)

        I think you're totally wrong. Although this movie isn't fantastic, it has pacing, editing and production values equal to most movies of its era and as good as any TV dramas diff not better.
        Not a great flick, but great entertainment at the time, or if you want a hoot now.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          hairybro2000 — 13 years ago(January 05, 2013 12:55 AM)

          I agree with you. For it's time, in 1974 it was quite a technical achievement. Sensurround was very impressive in the theatre, I loved it. Also not mentioned is that Earthquake is an Academy Award winning film. It won for Sound and technical achievements including the development of Sensurround. Also Charlton Heston and Ava Gardner did their own stunts. Yes the stories are a tad soap operish but it has an all star cast and was made years before cgi effects.
          I just wish that Universal would release this on blu ray.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            InherentlyYours — 9 years ago(August 29, 2016 12:20 AM)

            I agree, I have no complaint about the special effects, special effects. I found the acting scenes static, and the relationships cold. Robson's VOTD was the 2nd highest grossing film of 67', but it was an awful film, and only watchable to see Patty Duke make you smile with her displaced intensity. It's not about the box-office.
            Ava Gardner pretending to be asleep, then her big wide eyes open suddenly when the quake hits was embarrassing. Victoria Principal runs out of the theatre, then looks up with an instant "waaauuugh"-look. Gardner with
            "you're seeing that slut again, aren't you!?"
            was awful, and not because her character was supposed to be a bitch, but how she enacted it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              aussiebears — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 11:07 PM)

              One wonders what would have happened if Mario Puzo had completed a full working script for Earthquake before he was whisked off to do the Godfather sequel and Universal had had the money to do his script justice? instead we got a watered down paint by number style script by Mark Robson.
              While I reckon Charlton Heston is pretty good in this overall especially after viewing the cringe worthy sexist slop he played in Airport 75 at the same time I just cant buy into his love affair with Genevive Bujold, he has just supposedly made love to this beautiful young lady and he holds her like a dead fish, the whole scene is just dull, flat and lifeless like Robson's direction throughout most of the movie.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                InherentlyYours — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 11:21 PM)

                You lost me with
                sexist slop
                . I liked Airport75. How was he sexist ?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  aussiebears — 9 years ago(August 31, 2016 01:03 AM)

                  His dialogue which consisted of Nancy Babeee and Nancy honey , cringe worthy dialogue.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    InherentlyYours — 9 years ago(August 31, 2016 01:19 AM)

                    She was dating him. You dont' call you a loved one
                    honey
                    ? If you think that's "cringe worthy", you expect too much. You're looking for things.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      I_Love_Hutch — 9 years ago(August 31, 2016 11:20 AM)

                      One time me and some friends did a drinking game where we did a shot every time Chuck called Karen "baby". We got drunk before Myrna Loy.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        rascal67 — 9 years ago(August 31, 2016 04:21 AM)

                        I can think of hundreds of films made around the same time, or years, or even decades prior to this that are vastly superior.
                        As an example, I'll choose Towering Inferno because it's from the same period, and it's the same genre. Can't compare the two films Inferno is so brilliant on every level, it puts this film so completely in a shadow.


                        I think Towering Inferno
                        which I didn't have an opportunity to see on it's initial theatrical release
                        was over-long and flatly directed in parts. It tried to outdo THE POSEIDON ADVENTURE-72', which I think is terrific and superior to both Earthquake and Inferno.
                        Exorcist: Christ's power compels you. Cast out, unclean spirit.
                        Destinata:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          wmlopez — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 02:23 PM)

                          There are people who bad mouth TOWERING INFERNO. It just comes down to today's movie generation doesn't like old FX movies when they are used to cgi.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            wmlopez — 9 years ago(January 02, 2017 02:20 PM)

                            Would have to ask people who saw it in 1974 if it was lousy.
                            I saw it in 1974 and it was not.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              Woodyanders — 6 years ago(June 02, 2019 01:12 AM)

                              I thought this film was a real schlocky hoot. The various trashy subplots give this film a considerable amount of campy charm.
                              You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups