I think more then a lobotomy was performed
-
SnoozeAlarm — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 08:17 AM)
I think the OP raises an excellent point.
I did some research on lobotomies, and from what I gathered, a lobotomy resulting in a vegetative state, as in McMurphy's case, was extremely rare.
But the book/movie is even more unrealistic than that, in that the book/movie imply that McMurphy's state was a deliberate punitive measure.
From the research that I did, conducting a lobotomy for the express purpose of producing a vegetative state of mind was never ever done.
In this sense, the book/movie is extremely untrue to life.
Scariest words in English: Were from the federal government and were here to help. R. Reagan -
ida96 — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 05:52 PM)
If McMurphy were in a 'vegetative state' (think Sunny von Bulow), we would not have been sent back to the ward, but would have been in a hospital bed.
I think McMurphy was probably still recovering from whatever surgery had been performed (those scars had healed) and he was probably sedated as well. 'The Chief' knew that McMurphy would never be the same man and was therefore, for all intents and purposes, dead.