More like diapers.

[fgadmin]

BHt88 — 10 years ago(November 27, 2015 04:05 AM)

Ya they kill her outfit maybe they thought her outfit would be too sexy for tv?
But then again her ti&$ are pretty out there when wearing her WW outfit
BHT RISES myspace.com/blackheart60

[fgadmin]

crashdummy35 — 10 years ago(November 28, 2015 05:32 PM)

1970's television.
Just Google "Lynda Carter Nude". she would have worn a thong if they had let her.
She wasn't built like the broom stick, vegan, non-gluten starlettes of today.

[fgadmin]

dashersdad — 10 years ago(February 12, 2016 06:17 PM)

I agree, her bottoms should have been a tad skimpierlol

[fgadmin]

DrakeStraw — 10 years ago(February 12, 2016 08:35 PM)

More like diapers.
Nevertheless, in some of the later episodes they are so tight in the crotch that you can see the depression of an underlying cleavage!
DrakeStraw
LinkLikeThis
[link=SeeMarkupEnabled]

[fgadmin]

dashersdad — 10 years ago(March 28, 2016 01:01 AM)

She still looked great in that outfit, front & back!!

[fgadmin]

stefantann — 9 years ago(June 06, 2016 04:12 PM)

She's got a fantastic figure but those pantie things sure are unsexy. You are right, they do look like "nappies" as we call them in the UK. I think they couldn't take any chances at the time it was made.

[fgadmin]

lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 03:30 PM)

wrong, they are hot shorts, like hot pants. they are not panties because panties aren't worn on the outside.

[fgadmin]

fmvd2000 — 9 years ago(August 13, 2016 04:10 PM)

They did add padding to prevent the panties from forming Camel Toe and riding up her anal cleft

[fgadmin]

lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 03:32 PM)

no they didn't. why would she go pantyless? and who cares if her cameltoe shows? it's not like that's nudity or like nudity.

[fgadmin]

lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 03:28 PM)

no, you're wrong, because diapers aren't sexy or beautiful.