Do you get to see David Bowie's shlong in this movie?

[fgadmin]

psdhart — 12 years ago(May 30, 2013 06:15 AM)

it can be seen briefly in the gun scene

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

lroy77 — 13 years ago(August 01, 2012 06:26 PM)

But remember fellas, if there weren't vaginas there wouldn't be any penises (or is it vice versa?).

[fgadmin]

nephihaha — 13 years ago(August 05, 2012 09:13 AM)

"While they show a lot of penises, the vagina is still a taboo".
A bit easier to show penises, since they stick out.
On the other hand, one sees a lot of topless women in old films of the period.
Just as these days, it's almost obligatory for good looking women to get off with each other in tacky Hollywood blockbusters, but you'll hardly ever see two men get it on
It's not "sci-fi", it's SF!

[fgadmin]

lroy77 — 13 years ago(August 01, 2012 06:19 PM)

I sure did (hey, I was 18)! My mother of course was shocked, embarrassed, yadda. I would consider this scene soft-porn. This is the naughtiest movie I ever saw.

[fgadmin]

rileyinlondon — 13 years ago(August 08, 2012 02:55 AM)

We've been seeing naked men and women in film for around the same time, but I'd say the reason penises aren't so 'taboo' as vaginas is that up until maybe 20, 30 years ago, vaginas were totally engulfed by pubic hair! Like that scene in The Life of Brian, where a naked Judith defends Brian from his mum, and they could get away with this nudity because her hair covered her breasts, and her pubes covered everything. Only since women have started grooming like they do now have vagina shots been as 'graphic' as penis shots. You could never really see them before.

[fgadmin]

nephihaha — 13 years ago(August 20, 2012 06:08 AM)

"You could never really see them before."
Exactly, the female upper half is more obviously sexual, and the male lower half is more obviously sexual. perhaps
It's not "sci-fi", it's SF!

[fgadmin]

truekiwijoker — 13 years ago(August 21, 2012 03:27 PM)

Using the logic you apply in your repeated ad-hominem attacks against me;
This reveals that Nephihaha lusts after ladyboys!
Such a sexually repressed mormon.

[fgadmin]

nephihaha — 13 years ago(August 25, 2012 06:46 AM)

There is no dash between "ad" and "hominem".
"Post mihi non simili poena commissa luetis."
It's not "sci-fi", it's SF!

[fgadmin]

truekiwijoker — 13 years ago(August 25, 2012 03:12 PM)

There is no dash between "ad" and "hominem".
What a pathetic and desperate creature you are nephihaha.

[fgadmin]

nephihaha — 13 years ago(August 29, 2012 06:53 AM)

Post mihi non simili poena commissa luetis.
It's not "sci-fi", it's SF!

[fgadmin]

truekiwijoker — 13 years ago(August 31, 2012 09:35 PM)

Keep making me laugh with your delusions nephihaha.

[fgadmin]

nephihaha — 13 years ago(September 02, 2012 08:58 AM)

Causa latet, vis est notissima.
It's not "sci-fi", it's SF!

[fgadmin]

ishiidobie — 13 years ago(March 03, 2013 02:41 AM)

you guys are both idiots

[fgadmin]

hermione47 — 11 years ago(August 25, 2014 03:28 PM)

Yes, it is his junk. David Bowie using a body double? The man was drop dead gorgeous and off his head on drugs, he wouldn't have bothered.
Lucky lucky Candy Clark, how I do envy you!

[fgadmin]

Gabe1972 — 11 years ago(December 12, 2014 05:19 AM)

I don't recall ever seeing such a loaded question (no pun intended).
The plural of mouse is mice. The plural of goose is geese. Why is the plural of moose not meese?

[fgadmin]

minidiva48 — 10 years ago(January 24, 2016 04:02 AM)

I think he had a perfect package!!!

[fgadmin]

lantzn — 10 years ago(March 06, 2016 07:47 PM)

But you all are failing to take into consideration that he was an alien and the penis was just prosthetics, as were his ears, nipples, and contacts.