Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. How this movie doesn't garner more positive feedback is beyond me!

How this movie doesn't garner more positive feedback is beyond me!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
9 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Missouri Breaks


    Charles_Bronsons_Stache — 19 years ago(August 29, 2006 03:59 AM)

    INSANE. This film has got the whole shebang, and it's just not that, it domniates in every territory: From a magnificent script, beautiful cinematography, absorbing soundtrack, mesmerizing leads + excellent other cast to direction.
    I've tried, but I still fail to see how anyone could NOT like this film! To me, it's one of the greatest westerns ever played out, right up there with the best.
    And no, I love Brando's performance, one of his most memorable. 'Lips of salome, eyes of cleopatra' ! I love the fact that his voice changes in different scenes, just like his clothes do; he's already playing a weird guy, so why wouldn't this be a possiblity?
    As for Jack, I happen to think it's one of the best roles he's ever played. So energetic, yet harmonic. And he and Brando have great chemistry ( as the bathtub scene surely must have proven).
    So please tell me, how can you not like this movie?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      eliostar1 — 18 years ago(May 28, 2007 05:20 AM)

      In all honesty, when the calender hit 1970 they should have outlawed the making of any more westerns. The modern directors just didn't understand the genre, IMO.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        joekiddlouischama — 18 years ago(January 28, 2008 03:33 AM)

        In all honesty, when the calender hit 1970 they should have outlawed the making of any more westerns. The modern directors just didn't understand the genre, IMO.
        Robert Altman? Clint Eastwood? Certainly, the decade of the seventies featured its share of notable Westerns.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            joekiddlouischama — 18 years ago(January 28, 2008 03:31 AM)

            INSANE. This film has got the whole shebang, and it's just not that, it domniates in every territory: From a magnificent script, beautiful cinematography, absorbing soundtrack, mesmerizing leads + excellent other cast to direction.
            I've tried, but I still fail to see how anyone could NOT like this film! To me, it's one of the greatest westerns ever played out, right up there with the best.
            And no, I love Brando's performance, one of his most memorable. 'Lips of salome, eyes of cleopatra' ! I love the fact that his voice changes in different scenes, just like his clothes do; he's already playing a weird guy, so why wouldn't this be a possiblity?
            As for Jack, I happen to think it's one of the best roles he's ever played. So energetic, yet harmonic. And he and Brando have great chemistry ( as the bathtub scene surely must have proven).
            So please tell me, how can you not like this movie?
            You can read my mixed experience with
            The Missouri Breaks
            here:
            The Missouri Breaks
            was supposed to be a classic because it was directed by Arthur Penn (
            The Left Handed Gun
            ,
            Bonnie and Clyde
            ,
            Little Big Man
            ) and starred Marlon Brando and Jack Nicholson. However, it certainly didn't achieve classic status and instead went down as something of a dud.
            Personally, I've viewed the film twice, coming away with different reactions each time. The first was in early May 2002. I was 21-and-a-half and about to graduate from college, and at that point, I thought that
            The Missouri Breaks
            was a creepily electrifying psychological-thriller Western, with Brando and Nicholson tracking each other and dueling it out in the remote bad lands. The film carried a carnal charge, and it was the kind of movie where afterwards, I was sort of creeping around my small studio apartment, with everything seeming a little more vivid than usual. Certainly, my opinion of the film was high and I felt dynamically entertained.
            I next watched the film in late May 2007, and my response that time proved quite different.
            The Missouri Breaks
            was still striking in its carnality and its sense of how the Western environment created a feelng of phobia and danger. It showcased the remoteness of the wilderness and showed how a layered landscape could create a haunting spatial-temporal dynamic for those caught in its throes, the hunter and the hunted.
            Yet what had electrified me as a 21-year old young person on the verge of graduating from college five years earlier now dissatisfied me. The tracking duel that I'd first witnessed long ago now appeared too predictable (and not just because I'd seen the movie before) and tacky, too reliant on lame trickery. The gothic spookiness was still there, but now it seemed forced and cheap rather than naturalistic and organic, fizzling rather than thrilling, more tepidly curious than startling. The self-indulgence of Brando's performance appeared more annoying and absurd than compulsive (although it's still eccentric enough), and the script seemed to run out of ideas and fall into a formula of grotesque gimmickry.
            So in summation, I'd say that
            The Missouri Breaks
            stands as a curio, worth watching for its bizarreness and the decadence and remoteness that it captures (along with the directorial and acting talent on hand), but also worthy of multiple screenings to see if its surface and ostentatious elements hold up over time. With this Western, I don't think that they do.
            http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000007/thread/95936218?d=95942675#9594267 5

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              TheAnimalMother — 15 years ago(April 25, 2010 01:26 AM)

              I can't answer your last question, because I agree with you. Some people don't get Brando, and some people do. And this character is a prime example. I personally think he is brilliant in it, even if some others find it a terrible performance. To me, this kind of Brando performance was inspiriation to actors like Bill Murray and Robet Downey jr. I think the influence is fairly obvious in some of their roles. And they are all brilliant in their own way. I too think this is up there among the best westerns I have seen. Jack is great as usual, and so is Brando. At least, in my view. I have a lot of love for this film, the pace, the flow, the characters, it's great.
              My body's a cage, it's been used and abusedand ILIKE IT!!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Dorf_Dorkman — 15 years ago(July 03, 2010 10:42 AM)

                I agree. Just watched this for the first time yesterday. Beautiful cinematography, great score. All of the actors were good, and Jack and Marlon were superb. Brando's character here is unique, never have seen a character quite like this guy - very interesting and fun to watch. Excellent movie all around, one of the most underrated of all time.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  tolbs1010 — 15 years ago(July 13, 2010 10:47 PM)

                  Just finished viewing The Missouri Breaks for the first time and I agree with nearly all of the praise for this film with one notable exception. The music. The kind of music that informs you that you're watching a comedy. McGuane's script is funny enough without wanky harmonicas and banjos reminding you that things aren't to be taken too seriously.
                  Great movie overall though. One of Penn's best and one of Brando's best.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    dalldorfw — 15 years ago(July 17, 2010 10:03 PM)

                    I think it's because everyone talks like Larry The Cable Guy with his mouth full (come to think of it, the characters often did talk with their mouths full). I know there's a great movie here somewhere, but I could only understand about every other sentience.
                    The fact that they cranked up the sound effects and music while the actors mumbled their dialog didn't help either.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0

                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups