The Kitten
-
namaGemo — 10 years ago(January 20, 2016 11:28 AM)
Are you a complete moron? I didn't even need to ask that, of course you are. Obsessive? Let's see, correct me if I'm wrong.
This IS a discussion forum, yes or no?
Do people come here to discuss movies?
Did someone ask a question about a particular scene in this film?
Did other people along with myself, participate in answering this question?
You just got your panties in a twist because your answer was stupid and you didn't even know what actually happened in the film. So, you get mad at me for providing accurate details because you suck and your answer was completely baseless and ignorant.
Let me ask, WhyTF did you bother answering when you had zero details as to what happened?
And you're upset about my answer when yours was for 5hit?
Then you follow up with nonsensical responses like a 5 year old because you're wrong. Go cry to mommy. -
coldnaps — 10 years ago(January 21, 2016 03:33 PM)
Actually, the fact that you took the time to do a frame-by-frame "analysis" of something already obvious to anyone with a functioning brain is the textbook definition of obsessiveness.
Your answer was far from informative it was opinion, based on what you
thought
you saw. That's fine, but don't state it as fact. Other claims you made were simply patently false.
Seems like you;'re the one getting upset because someone dared to say your opinion isn't gospel. That, little nama, makes you the ignorant one who sucks. Not to mention the fact you're an arrogant ass. -
namaGemo — 10 years ago(January 21, 2016 04:41 PM)
And you're wrong. It wasn't obvious, and you know why?
NO, YOU don't know why, because you have a lack of comprehensive skills.
SO, let me fill in the obvious that you can't seem to get.
SOMEONE ASKED A QUESTION ON THIS FORUM!
SEE, if it was SO obvious, you first of all wouldn't have had a question to answer, but someone asked. So what does that tell you?
IT WASN'T OBVIOUS!
Secondly, look at the various answers. You know what that means?
IT WASN'T OBVIOUS!
As to me analyzing the film, what's the issue? I've done stop motion photography. I animate stop motion puppets ONE FRAME AT A TIME! You know how long it took me to check out all 20 some frames, about 20 seconds. How is that ocd when I'm watching the film and take a moment to analyze it?
And NOW you're lying. First, you didn't even know what occurred in the scene, stating the cat was killed. Wow, very observant. She picked it up and dropped it, and you're telling me I'm false in my comments? Do you ever pay attention when you watch anything?
What was false about my comments?
Let's give an example of who's point might carry more weight.
The scene shows a REAL kitten being picked up and dropped from a height of 3' and is not shown being killed.
Viewer #1 says: That was a fake cat that was used in the part where they killed that cat. They had the technology back in 1976 to make a fake cat look as impressive as a cgi cat from a jurassic park style movie, but with practical effects for a cheap movie.
Viewer #2 says: This movie was done on a shoestring budget and couldn't afford much in the way of special effects considering not much of anything was shown as far as visual effects. After taking a minute to analyze the film, I've established it was a real kitten picked up and dropped.
So, in your opinion, number 1 is correct, since number 1 obviously doesn't even remember the scene at all, thinking it was a kitten being killed in the scene, when it was picked up and dropped?
I'm hardly upset, but I do have the ability to express my opinion, you know, because this is a forum about films, and unlike you, when commenting, I know what I'm talking about, and it's obvious you don't.
And it's obvious you only bothered to comment because you like to stir up crap when you don't have a clue what you're talking about. The arrogant ass is the one who didn't watch the film, know about the scene, and bothered to tell someone who just watched it that they are wrong. Dumb dick! -
noveltylibrary — 10 years ago(January 21, 2016 06:00 PM)
You are correct, it was not obvious. Obnoxious for anyone to say that. I just watched it again and it was live until the last second where it seems to be fake. But the point was the kitten was flailing wildly beforehand. btw I'm glad sane thinking posters outweigh the others:)
-
namaGemo — 10 years ago(January 21, 2016 08:04 PM)
I appreciate your response. If I'm wrong about something, I'd at least admit it. I worked with a guy like this years ago. Someone would be commenting on a show (Madmen) they watched, and this guy would start telling them that's not the premise of the show, and then we look at each other like, wtf is he talking about? Then we find out he didn't even watch it.
You're left shaking your head as to why someone would comment if they didn't see it. Like what's his end game? -
coldnaps — 10 years ago(January 21, 2016 09:39 PM)
Well,you're obviously the kind of clueless, arrogant idiot who has to be right all the time, even when you're wrong, which you are. And again, you weren't expressing opinion, you were stating your opinion as fact.
And you have no idea why I commented; more incorrect assumption from an arrogant turd.
But you believe what you want. You're the type os asshat who would even when the truth is in front of you (not referring to this film).
BTW, learn basic English, genius. It's "years," not "year's". Third-grade level stuff -
namaGemo — 10 years ago(January 22, 2016 08:09 AM)
What is it that I'm wrong about? Someone else just watched it and backed up my conclusion.
Oh, sorry my swype did a word replacement and I didn't catch it. Damn, you've got me pegged over a spelling error.
And man, are you and angry upset little child.
COLDNAPS: "Waa waa! I was wrong and I can't admit it, so I'll keep making more crap up in an attempt to defend myself, because my parents were mean to me and never let me be right. Even though I'm clearly wrong, I'll fight tooth and nail with someone who corrected me about a scene in a movie I probably never saw since I didn't even describe it correctly."
THAT is arrogance. Your inability to see that you're wrong.
When was the last time you saw this film?
Why didn't you know that there was no kitten murdered in this scene?
What would make someone think a kitten being picked up and dropped 3' to the floor, could be concluded as a violent death scene of an animal?
What would make anyone think they needed an elaborate effect of a fake animal for 3 quick shots barely lasting 4 seconds in a cheap movie?
BTW, when correcting others about their spelling, check your own!
You're the type
os
asshat -
coldnaps — 10 years ago(January 22, 2016 11:02 AM)
"os" is a typo. "Year's" is a lack of knowledge of English grammar. But nice try.
And I never said a kitten was actually killed in making the film. As a far as the scene goes, the fact that you hear the fat guy screaming through the door, "You killed my cat!"
would seem to point to that. Guess you missed that in your careful scene-by-scene analysis, huh, Cecil B? -
namaGemo — 10 years ago(January 23, 2016 07:43 AM)
^^^
Doesn't know the difference between people complaining about a death scene being shown VISUALLY and one that isn't shown. What was shown was the girl picking up the cat and dropping the cat. At NO TIME was an actual death of a kitten shown. It was IMPLIED by the fat man after the door was closed. -
coldnaps — 10 years ago(January 23, 2016 10:12 AM)
Never said an actual death was visually depicted, did I? Reading comp problem, Cecil B?. However, in the scope, world, universe whatever term you choose of the film, the cat was killed. Didn't matter whether we actually see it or not; the fat guy confirms it.
And BTW, what, exactly, is "wad the fork?" -
kcmet79 — 9 years ago(April 04, 2016 01:54 AM)
Some people are effing idiots, and could care less about animal abuse. Ain't worth arguing about, sadly. It's so obvious it was a real animal, and further: it's been verified. The kitten's neck could have easily been broken. The only movie I've ever returned without watching. Piece of garbage crew.