"Irregardless" is not a word.
-
BigEasy1203 — 15 years ago(August 05, 2010 02:37 PM)
I think the Americans should have deported him back to Turkey to finish his sentence irregardless of how they treat their prisoners there.
Really? Regardless of how they treat their prisoners? So let's say they torture and mutilate their prisoners on a daily basis, for the entire length of their sentence. Then, once they have served their time they hang each prisoner in a public execution on the town square. You would just throw up your hands and say "Well, he did break the law in another country, so it's justified". By this logic you must have no problem with countries like China that are terrible when it comes to human rights issues. In countries like those, they have no problem ending peaceful protests by killing people. -
asoaso — 15 years ago(August 30, 2010 03:11 AM)
Typical American. Best country in the world, eh? Believe everything they see in films etc.
If you have a passport, go to Turkey, meet Turkish people and survey the country. If that doesn't change your tune, then nothing will.
I think what most people don't understand is that this was NOT the first time he had smuggled drugs out of Turkey. Prior to his arrest, he had been to Istanbul THREE times and smuggled 2 kilos out each time without getting caught. The first time he taped the hash to his leg and made a fake cast around it. He was a drug smuggler, end of story. He freely admitted this on camera.
The book was OK, but nothing special. So much had to be changed due to legal reasons that you can see why some people sympathise with Hayes for what he did, when they don't realise the true story. -
uncrules30 — 14 years ago(May 05, 2011 03:18 PM)
It does not matter if you think his punishment was harsh and unjust. It is THEIR law. If you get arrested abroad then you will be complete at the mercy of that nation's laws and no one will be able to help you. If you are in a country where farting is punishable by death, then it might be in your best interest to not fart.
-
Movie_map — 14 years ago(May 28, 2011 07:59 AM)
Spare me the 'Ugly American' rant. It's clear from the movie and subsequent interviews that Hayes broke the law and deserved to be punished. What was undeserved was the way he jerked around, partially for political reasons, by the Turkish legal system. He was just shy of finishing his original sentence before he was told he had to serve 30 years. That's unfair, immoral and inhuman, no matter where the person is from.
-
mobocracy — 14 years ago(June 13, 2011 03:25 PM)
On the surface, he broke the law and 'deserves' to be punished.
Below the surface? Laws against marijuana and hashish are a waste of time. Jailing a foreigner for smuggling drugs out of your country? A huge waste of time and money for Turkey he should have been stripped of any money and deported back to the US and told that if he's found in Turkey again he'll be subject to a life sentence.
Furthermore, he's treated brutally in medieval conditions (in the film), so even if he "deserved" to be jailed for some infraction, there's no way to justify that kind of treatment.
In the real world, it's hard to blame him for wanting to skip 30 years additional for smuggling hash, after he's already been sentenced and served 4 years? That's cruel. -
tabbycat — 14 years ago(June 30, 2011 03:47 PM)
Beyond cruel and unfair, I'll add this: a life sentence for smuggling is silly. It serves no purpose and makes a mockery of the entire concept of proportionality that the punishment should fit the crime.
A reasonable sentence for an economic crime like smuggling need only be long enough to deter those tempted to try it. Hence I disagree with the proposal to confiscate funds, deport, and threaten with life imprisonment upon return; that would invite freerollers to try smuggle-till-caught. No, four years in the craphole is about right, and enough to keep anyone missing a death wish from entering this brand of Turkish free enterprise.
Why a life sentence? What does it accomplish? Just this: it spurs other countriy's artists to make films that portray your country's people as uncivilized monsters, then distributes those films worldwide and collect Academy Awards for it. No more drug smuggling maybe but no tourism either. Just global ridicule and revulsion that persists to this day, 1/3 century later.
Maybe THAT is real justice. -
SpencerNolanRice — 14 years ago(July 06, 2011 12:23 AM)
Yes, I did feel sorry for him.
A life sentence for smuggling two, TWO kilos of Hash?? GET THE FUK OUTTA HERE!!
Those Turks were fuking pigs, just like he said at his re-trial. If it was Cocaine or Heroin, maybe. But Hash, no, that's just fuked. I'm not American either, I'm Canadian.
I really hope that Turkey isn't as bad as it was portrayed in this film. It was utterly disgusting. Reminds me a lot of the film 'Return to Paradise'. I think that takes place in Malasia or Bangkok though.
Anyway, I did feel sorry for the kid. The world needs to lighten the fuk up on it's marijuana laws. Nobody deserves what he recieved for some fu*king hash. Get real.
"The track crack like, Floor verse porcelain, Porsche I'm in, Baby red like abortion skin!" ~Novi Novak -
averagejoeman2013 — 14 years ago(July 08, 2011 11:45 AM)
Not sorry for him but inspired. A little more of that treatment in the prisons in the states would be a nice start.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." - Albert Einstein -
PussyCrusher_Principal — 14 years ago(July 24, 2011 04:37 AM)
oh, I guess I signed on just in time for the "law and order" contingentor at least the tough-talking-from-behind-a computer branchletting anyone treat another living thing that way - allowing them that power - is a tremendously bad idea and a slippery slope. What a dumb thing to say (or type).
Anyway, about this post:
"On the flip side, I have little tolerance for drug users, and it is typical American thinking that other countries should think as we do in terms of punishment for certain crimes."
You have little tolerance for drug USERS? Is that what you meant to say? Why would you care what anyone else puts into their own body? Other than wanting to control the behavior of all citizens, right up until they close their doors and get under the covers at night, that is. I'd say THAT'S more typically American than what you said.
"How do you feel?"
"Like the Kling-Klang King of the Rim-Ram Room!" -
Elmware — 14 years ago(July 24, 2011 10:47 PM)
Why would you care what anyone else puts into their own body?
Because the foolish behavior of others affect the rest of us in many ways. Much like how you see families torn apart because one person makes this bad choice to put these substances in their bodies, or they resort to stealing from us so they can get their next fix at our expense.
I remember watching a Steve Wilco Show awhile ago, and there was this woman who was hooked on crack and she sold everything the family had to get her fix. The family had no furniture, TV, or hardly anything left because of one selfish crack addict in the family. She even sold her nephew's PSP and blamed it on her own son. This is one of many ways the rest of us are affected by these people who do this to themselves.
So why should I care if my stuff gets stolen so someone can pump it into their veins? Would you care if it happened to you? -
just_a_guy — 14 years ago(November 15, 2011 07:44 AM)
This is what happens when you live life through TV. Have you done any research into addiction? DO you have any first hand experience? Have you given any thought to the fact that drugs are expensive because they are illegal? What a crack/heroin/etc addict pays on the street is marked up thousands of percent by the time it gets to them. Punishment has NEVER cured a drug addict so why lock them up? It is insane on the face of it.
Do a little investigating and find the truth behind this so called drug war. If it doesn't open your eyes and change your opinion about it, consider it a failed IQ test.
Love the Christian, Hate the Dogma
-
lomd — 14 years ago(November 28, 2011 01:06 AM)
I can see a fair case for diplomatic efforts for reducing his sentence, but otherwise you represented my feelings quite accurately.
I don't know how faithful the movie is to the book (although what I have heard isn't at all flattering to the real Hayes), but the movie character strikes me as a self-righteous criminal, a whinny hypocrite that took a selfish gamble that he was not at all prepared to handle and attempted to take refuge in some particularly sick form of proud nationalism.
In a way it is fascinating, how the story sets up a fascinating premise and merrily runs away from it towards a far less interesting plot. Then again, this is based on a book, so I guess they can only stray so far. And unfortunately, from what I have read Oliver Stone's script seems to have strayed towards attempting to present the protagonist as some sort of implausible "macho" action hero, Rambo-style. That is not missing a plot opportunity, it is deliberately obfuscating it in order to avoid the thorny feelings and questions.
This movie is often accused of racism, but I think the racism is actually rather accidental (both in the book and the movie). It does exist, but it is needed only as a means for the (rather gross) attempt at nationalist, ufanist self-justification of the hypocratical protagonist, who needs a straw to grab in order to run away from the rather obvious fact that he is a criminal that was caught red-handed and is now feeling sorry for himself. -
badgerking10 — 13 years ago(August 05, 2012 07:16 AM)
I want to read the book and find out the "real" story. But, as far as the film's concerned, I think there is an element of: "I'm American, therefore I'm invulnerable" Having said that and putting to one side the question of prison conditions, what's the point of keeping him locked up - at the expense of Turkish tax-payers - for an excessive amount of time Make him serve a sensible sentence, deport him and ban him from coming back So, while I certainly don't feel sorry for him - he brought the situation on himself - the punishment was excessive.