Not very good
-
bonehunter7 — 18 years ago(November 12, 2007 10:44 AM)
Well said. I didn't like it when I saw it in the theater 30 years ago. When I saw it on cable again the other night I still didn't like it.
"North Dallas Forty" is still the best football movie ever made. -
buby1987 — 18 years ago(October 17, 2007 08:59 PM)
I loved Semi Tough when it came out, and I still love it. It's a great satire of 70's culture. It has more in common with Annie Hall than Longest Yard. It was marketed (wrongly) as a football movie. Football is just a backdrop. Hey, I love football, but this film is aiming at wider targets.
I think Reynolds should have been nominated for Best Actor for Semi Tough. This is Reynolds at his best. Plus, highbrow critic Richard Schickel gave the film a rave review. This is American satire in the vein of Mark Twain.
Preston was great, too, should have been Oscar nominated. And it made Jill Clayburgh a semi-star, until a few months later she reach full stardom in An Unmarried Woman. -
wolfsblood66210 — 17 years ago(May 27, 2008 12:17 PM)
I agree that this film was more like a Woody Allen movie than a typical Burt Reynolds film. But I didn't find it very funny or entertaining.
I'd also point out that they have everyone dropping "f-bombs" all over the place constantly which is distracting. In 1977 I guess it was considered daring and cool to do that. It adds nothing to the film and it's annoying.
After watching this film I wondered how Burt Reynolds career might have gone had he got a good role in a film like Godfather or Godfather II. He'd have been the best actor to play one of the Corleones because he actually looks like Marlon Brando. It seems like Burt Reynolds always played the same character in every one of his films from the 70s and early 80s! -
richard-865 — 10 years ago(February 02, 2016 05:47 AM)
If you thought there was an excessive use of the "F-bomb" in this movie, you definitely don't want to read the book. The book is far, far raunchier than anything depicted in the movie. The book is also far, FAR superior to this dreary, disappointing film. One of the worst movie adaptations of a book ever.
-
WarpedRecord — 16 years ago(December 31, 2009 11:10 AM)
Well, I hate football, and I loved this film. This is definitely not a sports movie, but a very sharp satire on American values in the mid-'70s. I loved this when I saw it 30 years ago, and I love it today.
I can't understand all the negative views on this film. I think this is a fine example of a '70s-style "buddy" picture. Burt, Kris and Jill are terrific, and Robert Preston and Bert Convy are hilarious in their supporting roles.
This film never really found its niche too abstract for the sports crowd, too low-brow for the art crowd but to those who appreciate it, it is a true treasure for the time capsule. -
SurvivorAlpha23 — 16 years ago(March 14, 2010 02:13 PM)
I don't understand why they keep hiring Kris Kristofferson to act in anything but I still liked this movie, most for Burt's sake. Robert Preston was hilarious in this movie, but then I find him to be hilarious even when he's not trying to be.
Maybe the acting wasn't on par with what any of them are capable of doing (except Kris) but it was still a happy fun movie for me.
My Sig: Nothing Here -
WarpedRecord — 16 years ago(March 14, 2010 03:23 PM)
I think Kris is an acquired taste as an actor, just as he is as a singer, but I'm biased because I'm a fan.
But we both agree that Robert Preston is one of the great comic actors. There's something zany about his facial expressions, even when he's not trying to be funny. I love this film for its oddball quality, and the fact that I'm never quite sure what to make of it.