Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. My thoughts on the end scene–spoilers

My thoughts on the end scene–spoilers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
9 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Being There


    thomas196x2000 — 10 years ago(February 13, 2016 09:38 PM)

    I have read many, many interpretations of the ending scene. I have my own thoughts on it, just how it struck me, both at the time of seeing it and pondering it after.
    Some have said that it likens him to a Jesus figure. I don't agree. There is nothing in the movie that gives indication that he is Jesus, Jesus-like, or anything else in a spiritual sense.
    Others have commented that because he is so lucky, he just happens to wander into a shallow area by chance, (like his name, ha ha!), and the proof point is his checking the watere.g. he would not have to check the water if he was truly walking on it.
    I don't buy that either. There is no point for the setup of all that for such a bland explanation, especially for the end of the film. He is checking the water to show us, the audience, that the water is deepa plot device if you will. If it was shallow there, it would still be shallow a little ways over!
    My feeling is he is of course walking on water. How he can do that, or who he really is, is not the point. The point is, that we the viewer, are put into the same predicament that the very characters in the movie find themselves.
    During the entire movie, people take just what they see, and make it into what they want it to be. His philosophy for simple gardening as a metaphor for the economy. His basic communication abilities for someone with depth and thoughtfulness of answer. His demeanor mistaken for someone who might be hiding something. His pleasantness for love. His innocence for directness. We laugh along with the situations because we KNOW what the deal is.
    At the end, we find that we DON'T know what the deal really is. We made assumptions about Chance right along with everyone else. And we do that in life when we judge others, all day long, every day, without really knowing them or what they are about. We do business with people we don't know, we have friends that if we really knew them, we might not be their friends, we have sex with people we think love us, and we may not really even know them.
    So the ending makes us look at us. It is just as plain as that, and I thoroughly enjoyed that curveball!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      giantrobot503 — 9 years ago(April 15, 2016 11:49 PM)

      This is a great analysis. Nice work.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        thomas196x2000 — 9 years ago(May 26, 2016 09:12 PM)

        Thank you. I hope you enjoyed the movie as much as I did.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          CalibMcBolts — 9 years ago(June 05, 2016 03:04 PM)

          I dont really understand your explination, i love the thought that went in to it, but i cant see how that explains the ending. Personally the second one makes more sense in context of the movie

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            BobbyDupea — 9 years ago(June 14, 2016 07:27 AM)

            Others have commented that because he is so lucky, he just happens to wander into a shallow area by chance, (like his name, ha ha!), and the proof point is his checking the watere.g. he would not have to check the water if he was truly walking on it.
            There is no point for the setup of all that for such a bland explanation, especially for the end of the film. He is checking the water to show us, the audience, that the water is deepa plot device if you will. If it was shallow there, it would still be shallow a little ways over!
            There is no point for the setup leading to his lucky walk out into the shallow water? The entire movie is filled with episodes of Chance being very lucky- hence his name. In addition, it doesn't make any sense to conclude that we don't know Chance and can't interpret his actions - it is established early in the movie that he is a simpleton who knows nothing outside of his employer's home and television.
            The end of the movie clearly shows Chance testing the depth of the water all around him, with his cane. He isn't showing the water's depth to us - we don't exist in the world depicted in the movie. He is unsure of the water's depth himself - that's why he is testing it.
            My real name is Jeff

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              somesunnyday — 9 years ago(June 21, 2016 04:46 AM)

              That's a brilliant summation and in fact, I think it makes the most sense. The ending doesn't answer any questions categorically or provide a perfectly neat explanation, just like the characters and their thoughts on Chance.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                MisterMooso — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 08:10 PM)

                I've always believed he doesn't sink because he doesn't know what he can't do.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  DaveDiggler — 9 years ago(October 30, 2016 04:44 AM)

                  Exactly; it's symbolic.
                  It's likely he's never seen a pond before, so he just walks on the water because he thinks he can (or, maybe more appropriately, he doesn't know he can't walk on water), and like everything we've seen before, he comes out smelling like roses.
                  The last line of the movie only reinforces this idea.
                  Poetry don't work on whores.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    rwjaco — 9 years ago(December 14, 2016 12:24 AM)

                    Well thought out!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0

                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups