Sellers should have won the Oscar!!!!
-
ragingbull1965 — 10 years ago(November 25, 2015 01:27 PM)
I never read any such comment but I don't think that was the reason, thought I could be wrong (certainly not the first or last time). Whatever the reason, he was robbed and no matter the reason, one is just as good as another and nothing can change the injustice that was done.
-
ecjones1951 — 10 years ago(December 23, 2015 10:48 AM)
If you're keeping track, this is one of those in between times you were wrong. OK, OK, relax. The reason I did not post the source you required previously was that I could not remember which book it was in, so now, here you are.
Grossing Out's- future, however, had been put in doubt after Sellers saw Ashby's outtake ending, which he felt undermined the impact of
Being There.
In a rushed and emotional telex set to Ashby in March 1980, he said, "I must reiterate once again that the outtakes you have placed over the credits do a grave injustice to the picture for the sake of a few cheap laughs. It breaks the spell, do you understand? Do you understand, it breaks the spell!" "as I said in my previous telegram there's not much point in the film going to Europe as I saw it last night." Sellers believed that the outtakes had hurt his chances of winning the Best Actor Oscar, so in an attempt to repair their friendship, Ashby changed the European prints to have the regular ending Sellers favored.
*Grossing Out
was the movie Ashby and Sellers were planning to do next.
Nick Dawson.
Being Hal Ashby: Life of a Hollywood Rebel
Screen Classics, 2011
That's on page 226, btw. As the kids say, "hope this helps!"
- future, however, had been put in doubt after Sellers saw Ashby's outtake ending, which he felt undermined the impact of
-
ragingbull1965 — 10 years ago(December 23, 2015 01:52 PM)
Thank you for posting. As someone who has never liked technicalities, I would sincerely hope that the final decision did not come down to something so trivial but I guess when something goes down to the wire, anything can be used as a tiebreaker. At any rate, if indeed this was the reason why Sellers did not win, then all I can say is that the judges did not take the outtakes in the spirit in which they were intended. Yes your post helped a lot. It's the one new thing I learned today (well, I learned something else new from another poster regarding another topic but you rank up there also).
-
ragingbull1965 — 10 years ago(December 30, 2015 06:03 AM)
Exactly my point. Many actors could have played Hoffman's role but I honestly cannot think of any other actor of Sellers' generation that could have played Chance. Simply put, he was robbed and nothing can undo the injustice that was done to him.
-
flirtatiousbarbie311 — 9 years ago(September 06, 2016 03:09 PM)
Peter Sellers in Being is the definition of greatness. It's moving, so unnerving, and so true. He should have won the Oscar. Plain and simple.
The only actor right now that can play Chance is Steve Carell. He even looks like Sellers.
http://www.complexmuse.com/notoriously-uncensored