Are you kidding?
-
UpperEastSider — 11 years ago(March 05, 2015 07:54 PM)
I prefer the 2006 version over the 1979 version, actually. As many have said, the original has a great beginning and end but the middle is basically just some boring crime/drama. Didn't care much for way it was structured. I would have much preferred it to be structured the way the remake was, with the story taking place in one night, rather than over a coarse of ten or 15 years or so.
When life knocks you down, roll over and look at the stars -
ricky_may-47537 — 10 years ago(December 05, 2015 08:39 AM)
The 2006 film is all right, but it doesnt hold a candle to the original. The 1979 film is one of my favorite horror films ever made, and the opening 20 minutes are among the creepiest in horror history. Also, the original has a much more foreboding atmosphere, and the score is better as well.
Both are good, but I gotta pick the 1979 film. -
sillyspaghetti — 10 years ago(February 17, 2016 03:56 PM)
1979 version is better from my standpoint. I thought the middle was really cool on a psychological level. As others have said, the opening and ending are both pretty freaky. I give this version an 8 and the remake a 5.