Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Country + RAP = CRAP

Country + RAP = CRAP

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
9 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Excalibur


    toldyousew — 12 years ago(August 26, 2013 01:16 PM)

    Country + RAP = CRAP
    Country + ROCK = CROCK

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Blueghost — 12 years ago(August 26, 2013 06:43 PM)

      Are you writing a paper or something?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        MIJACology — 12 years ago(December 30, 2013 09:58 AM)

        I always had the suspicion that Arthur wasn't really expecting Mordred to be capable of what he did, and so the spear thrust caught him by surprise. It was his son after all. Mordred was a disrespectful little brat.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          jh66 — 12 years ago(January 04, 2014 09:58 AM)

          I took it to mean that death (whether by Mordred or any of his men) was Arthur's destiny, as he himself explains to Guenevere at the Nunnery?
          Casting Excalibur away was the trigger for Arthur to be carried off to the Isle of Avalon.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            djj93312 — 12 years ago(March 22, 2014 04:13 PM)

            Arthur was also exhausted after the battle. I think he knew the only way he could get close enough to Mordred to kill him was to allow Mordred to run him through.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              pospred23 — 11 years ago(May 17, 2014 06:37 AM)

              Because of this film, I was always under the impression that Arthur used Excalibur and Mordred used a spear during their battle, but some texts suggest that Arthur uses a spear and Mordred uses a sword and it is Arthur who stabs Mordred first before Mordred rushes through the spear and mortally wounds Arthur.
              My question is, does anyone know which version is more prevalent?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                pol-edra — 11 years ago(May 26, 2014 11:36 AM)

                I think you are not alone in thinking Arthur used Excalibur: the sword is so famous, it seems only logical that the king should use it to slay his enemy. Thus, I think that even if Malory's version (which is most English-speakers' medieval reference) has Arthur gutting Mordred with a spear, and even if it is that scene which Arthur Rackham has so famously illustrated, that illustration (and other famous ones) got misinterpreted and long-lastingly embedded the image of Mordred's spear and Arthur's sword in the final battle.
                http://www.timelessmyths.com/arthurian/gallery/mordredarthur.jpg
                "
                Occasionally
                I'm callous and strange."

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  crashdummy35 — 10 years ago(October 27, 2015 11:52 AM)

                  I believe he did.
                  To be rid of all the "evil" that was done when he fathered a son with his sister. Remember, God struck Arthur down with lightning when the abomination was born into the world.
                  And: no weapon forged by man could destroy Mordred while he had on his magical armor. It took Excalibur to get to his heart.
                  That was an excellent scene.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    al666940 — 10 years ago(October 27, 2015 08:18 PM)

                    Agreed.
                    I mean, it's obvious he allowed Mordred to mortally wound him (out of guilt maybe or misplaced sense of responsibility to die alongside his own son). It's not like he's surprised/terrified/afraid or anything but resigned after killing him.
                    His time has passed, and like Merlin before him, he now has to retreat and fade away.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0

                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups