Leo was cool…caan overreacted
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Thief
ArchxStanton — 11 years ago(January 04, 2015 10:24 AM)
Leo did take care of his peoplehe got cann a house..kid..n the score. Caan was in his right to be pissed off. He should have negotiated w Leo for more cash. At least told Leo give me half of the 830k90k was fkd up n Leo was in the wrong. Just seemed like Caan coukd have gotten more cash from Leo then killed him or just did another score and rip off Leo .
-
lorenzb-2 — 11 years ago(January 23, 2015 08:18 AM)
Once Leo got his hooks into Frank, he knew there was no way out. Leo said himself he was going to work Frank to death and he would have gotten pain less and less until he was a slave. Leo told him straight up that he could quit anytime, but didn't mean it. How could you expect honesty for such a slimy crook? If you lay down with dogs you're going to get fleas. Frank may have been a great thief, but otherwise he wasn't very bright.
-
MortSahlFan — 9 years ago(January 27, 2017 02:52 PM)
Leo was scum. Just because he said, doesn't make it true - it's a movie. Take what evidence is given to you.
I don't like violence (in real-life or in movies) but I was so glad when he was killed, without being able to even lay a finger on James Caan. -
Woodyanders — 8 years ago(December 25, 2017 06:13 PM)
Leo was a lying and manipulative control freak scumbag who totally deserved to be rubbed out by Frank at the end. Leo was planning on making Frank work for him until he burnt himself out, so Frank had no choice but to kill Leo at the end.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.