Dinner scene a little too drawn out?
-
Joe_Walsh — 14 years ago(June 04, 2011 07:46 AM)
I don't think so. To me, it was an example of the decadent, disgusting nature of the Skeksis - they were base creatures existing solely to satisfy their urges.
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five!- Groucho Marx
-
Im_your_Papi — 10 years ago(November 26, 2015 08:00 AM)
Good point..I also heard the Skeksis were based on the 7 deadly sins and then placed in the form of Skeksis. They're very well represented in all aspects They're gluttons, they're greedy, they're dirty, they're envious of power/position, They're arrogant, They're lustful in the sense of living forever, and especially they're Wrathful and full of rage.
Yup, really nasty creatures, in fact, think of them as demons in purgatory with no real celestial power anymore, not since shattering the crystal. -
gg82 — 14 years ago(August 14, 2011 07:31 PM)
I think the scene was necessary. It really showed how gross and beastly they were. They may wear loads of clothes and jewelry, live in a huge castle, and own the powerful dark crystal, but they were far from being sophisticated creatures. The dinner scene was so disgusting. The part where one of them drinks water from a bowl reminded me of a dog.
-
lm362 — 10 years ago(November 21, 2015 11:29 PM)
I did think some parts of the movie could have been a little shorter and would still have made their point. This scene you mentioned and the ones where the podlings had their essence drained and they tried to drain Kira's.