So Amazingly ahead of its time, it needs a remake
-
enfilmigult — 10 years ago(December 21, 2015 11:57 PM)
You know, you're right! That's an interesting point about it being a 1980s movie in which a big, money-making company is actually a bad thing. I clicked on this thread ready to reply with something like "whaddaya mean 'ahead of its time,' it's Invasion of the Body Snatchers with a fresh paint job,"* but that never occurred to me.
*But I love it, ha ha. -
renatom1 — 10 years ago(November 14, 2015 08:55 PM)
The storylineas isprobably wouldn't work today. For one thing, practically everyone has cellphones, so Cochran cutting off the landlines would not stop Dan from reaching the outside world and foiling Cochran's plans.
-
DrDanielChallis — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 10:43 AM)
Just remember that this came out at the later stages of the late 70s/early 80s recession period - not the mid to late 80s Charlie Sheen / Kirk Douglas Wall Street era
The movie reflects a bleaker time period and line of thinking in America - not counting the oil issue to the inflation issue for now, but, it wasn't until at least 85 - 87' that peoples' fears about nuclear exchange with the Soviets started to die down, and when the big bubble that we've experienced over the past 20 years was first built
im not going economical or political here, I'm just saying - the movie very much belonged in this time period, and could have been made from 77-83'.
Look at the isolation and bleakness of the first 3 Halloween films (78 - 82) then look at the sleeker, made for tv or soap opera / MTV look of Halloween 4 and 5 (88-89) -
dave626 — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 04:16 PM)
Exactly. Each "trilogy" 1-3, 4-6 were products of the their time. The sensibilities, the technology, etc. The feel was even different. When 4-6 came out it was at the height of TV teen show angst. Even the later 2, H20 and Res. took from their current themes, Scream in one, webcam fad the other.
I personally think this doesn't need a remake and is fine as it is and appreciated for what it was, a B movie pod movie as Wallace intended and has admitted. Not a thing wrong with that. Watch Invasion of the Body Snatchers, then this with a tub of popcorn and enjoy
"He came home." - Dr. Sam Loomis from the original HalloweeN -
YippeeKiYay_MF — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 09:02 PM)
I've been thinking about this remake question. I love this movie, and like other people have mentioned, I believe it belongs to a special time that is no more.
Thta being said, I'm very aware it is not a perfect movie, and some things could have been improved. So, sometimes I do feel like I would like to see this being remade. But these times it's just too much to ask for a decent movie to be made, much less a remake.
Still, someone like the director of The Guest (which nods to this one) could do something of justice.
I'll be good I swear I'll never see a movie ever again. -
dave626 — 9 years ago(September 02, 2016 05:55 AM)
Never saw it. Heard it wasn't good. Last time Cage was in something like that was Wicker Man. Pun intended, I got burned on that one too. As for a remake, yes, it could be, especially with surveillance and computer advancements that we have now. But that would take the cheese out of it. Which is what made this film so great. It wasn't meant to be thought provoking or topical, but fun and scary. You lose that if you go high tech.
So no, a remake would have to be paired down to capture the feel it had. Same with the Fog. The remake was utter garbage due to having very little to do with the original's story and the CGI upgrades. Some things are fine as they are and don't need an update. Halloween III is one of those films to let it rest.
"He came home." - Dr. Sam Loomis from the original HalloweeN
