Disturbing
-
-
AndyRyan — 12 years ago(March 13, 2014 03:27 AM)
"Disturbing because it's an old (41) man having sex with his daughter's friend"
Kind of worse than that, as Caine was 51, not 41 in 1984. That makes him THREE times her age. Plus, all the scenes when he talks about being at her christening, or at the hospital when she was born yuk yuk yuk. -
caraeas — 18 years ago(November 17, 2007 10:02 AM)
You really can't make such broad generalizations about who any one person might be attracted to.Most of the high profile recent cases of female teachers getting involved with underage male students underscores this.Many are attractive married women with families,yet some loose screw(uhno pun intended) induces them to view these children as romantic partners.
I suspect also,that the vast majority of young girls who fantasize about older men tend to envision the "bring me flowers and hold my hand" type of romantic fantasy,rather than the more physical fantasys that boys are prone to.Notice I said"vast majority"so as not to be guilty of making another broad generalization. -
lilred0130 — 16 years ago(February 22, 2010 02:52 PM)
Yeah there's something real dirtubing about a girl standing around topless in front of her father
I think this movie is very funny , but I have to say that part has always grossed me out, too. Not only standing there topless, but also grabbing his arm and pulling him into the ocean to frolic around. Eww! Other than that, it was a great flick!
I'm smitten. I'm in deep smit. -
LaraOSF — 16 years ago(May 11, 2009 02:14 PM)
Wow, great example. "Quality nights" spent with many twenty-ish year old "girls" in Thailand.
Thailand is the playground for socially challenged and middle-age men to frolic with under age and trans-gender/she-male prostitutes who turn to such lives due to poverty.
Disturbing? Your comment is. -
okwong-e — 16 years ago(May 27, 2009 12:06 PM)
BLAME IT ON RIO, while we all know there have been cases like the plot in real life, unfortunately comes across as an icky misogynistic fantasy which, more offensively, isn't even a good enough movie to justify it eyebrow raising concept.
-
mcfly-31 — 16 years ago(May 28, 2009 02:54 AM)
If anything, this film totally tells an accurate acount of how certain nymphs can be easily swayed into thinking they're in "love". Drew Peterson, anyone? The guy has two dead wives (one he met when she was 19) and another in tow at 23 despite his track record!! Or these geeks who write letters to serial killers on death row. Some girls just lack common sense or dig on the father figure angle. IT HAPPENS!! Others are gold-diggers, while some are unstable morons. The girl in this film was your typical 17-18 year old girl who mistook a childhood crush (she mentions fantasizing about him when she was a little girl) and thinking it's truuuuuue love. Then note how quickly she gets over Caine and is galavanting off with another guy at the end of the film.
Sure, the writers were in fantasy mode (Gelbart and Peters were in their mid-40s and 50s themselves) and wrote from a beyond-middle-aged guy getting a divorce point of view. They even tried to make Caine somewhat reluctant to the whole situation, but finally reach a point of "a busty, horny 17-year-old is thrusting herself at meoh well" mindset. When in real life they probably wouldn't have thought twice and used the girl for all she was worth. -