And you hear her having rough sex with Rod.
-
AdrianLePier — 10 years ago(April 23, 2015 09:57 AM)
30 is an exaggeration, but she didn't look 15. Maybe around 21. But one has to remember that in those days, teenagers tended to dress and look older than they do now. Nowdays 15 year olds still look like they're in middle school, but 30 years ago they could look 21.
-
LarrupinLou — 10 years ago(February 14, 2016 03:43 PM)
30 is an exaggeration, but she didn't look 15. Maybe around 21.
That's more like it. I was 18 when the film came out and I never thought she was a decade older than me at the time. She was a leggy dream, IMO.
No blah, blah, blah! -
benbo-3 — 10 years ago(November 01, 2015 12:05 AM)
Amanda Wyss has sharp features, & the short hair did more tomake her looksevere. She's conclusively hot - if u want to see her looking young, she was on an episode of
Cheers
playing Woody's Indiana girlfriend visiting Boston. With normal lighting and long hair, she looked young. -
Intothenightalone — 10 years ago(February 20, 2016 03:33 AM)
Actress was 23, but her "look" is still seen on women who are now in their 40s-50s. It's why when I see movies from the 80s the guys look like young guys but the women look like middle aged women with great skin, because their "look" is middle-aged.
-
snparks — 9 years ago(August 25, 2016 05:54 PM)
To me she looked about 17-18, give or take. The mousy hairdo didn't do her much justice, I'll admit that. The part about teens looking like middle-school kids I disagree with that. I've seen some amazing bodies on 16 year old girls daily so nothing has changed as far as sexual maturity goes but as far as mental maturity they were definitely better years ago before all this lame coddling and forcing teens and young adults to stay kids longer than they should. It will hurt them in the long run.