Not very smart. But they needed a sequel so…

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

---

The Kraken — 3 years ago(January 10, 2023 02:12 AM)

Not very smart. But they needed a sequel so…

[fgadmin]

merry christmas — 3 years ago(January 10, 2023 02:38 AM)

It's a Navy thing. Burial in space instead of burial at sea. I think Leonard Nimoy intended for Spock to be dead until they offered him a pile of money to come back.

[fgadmin]

Deliciousfeet — 3 years ago(January 10, 2023 02:43 AM)

He directed part three…maybe a pile of money too

[fgadmin]

The Kraken — 3 years ago(January 10, 2023 02:44 AM)

The radiation from Spock's corpse contaminated the planet. Duh.
Why didn't Kirk anticipate that? A new planet contaminated by something that shouldn't be there.
Lol

[fgadmin]

merry christmas — 3 years ago(January 10, 2023 02:53 AM)

A planet is a big object. I don't think Spock could be so radioactive to harm it.

[fgadmin]

The Kraken — 3 years ago(January 10, 2023 03:09 AM)

Okay, everything was explained within the first 20 minutes of the film. Duh

[fgadmin]

Wildman-Wizard — 3 years ago(January 10, 2023 03:14 AM)

In the book he was supposed to burn up in the atmosphere, but Saavak programed it to land instead.