When he brings the deer back to life
-
strntz — 11 years ago(February 02, 2015 04:51 PM)
They were hunting for sport. They weren't staving. beep them.
The rube offered Jenny a haunch of venison (and then some pork, but that might have been a different offer) so it appears that the rubes do at least eat the venison. This isn't to say that hunters also get some thrill in killing something alive or that that is their primary reason for hunting. It's not for me, but I really have no problem with deer hunters as long as they kill humanely and don't waste the kill.
What infuriates me though are the a$$wipes that go "big game hunting" at a reserve where old circus animals (mostly tame or just feeble) are shot so these "hunters" can get their picture taken standing over the kill. I'd be impressed if they did that in Africa.
It is bad to drink Jobus rum. Very bad. -
strntz — 11 years ago(February 04, 2015 04:20 AM)
The deer was strapped to the hood of a car.
Pretty hard to get a deer that size inside a car even the size of that Caprice.
They could have even been poaching on the way home.
Could have, but I don't think poachers generally show their kill in public like these rednecks were doing.
It is bad to drink Jobus rum. Very bad. -
Enigmatic-Ocean — 11 years ago(February 04, 2015 07:10 PM)
I don't remember anywhere in this movie where the people who shot that deer said that they shot it just for thrills. And strapping a shot deer to a car hood is a very common way to bring a deer home to be cleaned and eaten. Again, you have to kill it before you can grill it.
VHS>DVD -
SamuelLJedi — 11 years ago(February 04, 2015 07:16 PM)
Did any of the hunters look starving to you? Because they weren't. In fact they had enough money to waste at the bar and give away deer meat for free. They weren't hunting for sustenance, so beep them if Starman made their deer come back to life. The scene works as a way to show how primitive humans are compared to Starman. This shouldn't be a confusing scene at all.
-
06986 — 11 years ago(February 04, 2015 08:53 PM)
Wow, samueljedi, your name should be bambi lover hypocrite. You sound like you need to see a psychiatrist and get on some meds if you are wishing death on hunters in a movie where they purposefully tried to make the hunter characters as bad as they possibly could to invoke a childish reaction from a viewer like you. Typical self loathing peta nutjob type that cares more about animals then humans beings.
Hope you have never eaten meat or else you are a total hypocrite. The guy offered the woman venison which means he was going to eat it just like all the hypocrites who eat chicken, steak, or fish dishes at restaurants or buy them at the supermarket but have something against hunters and hunting. Sport hunters also eat the meat, they just go for bigger animals, sport hunters don't just shoot something for the hell of it, even if you have the head stuffed you heat the rest of the animal because you don't eat the head. People who know absolutely nothing about hunting should really not be criticizing it. -
Dragonsouls — 11 years ago(February 04, 2015 09:53 PM)
You know, I would think fans of this film would be a little more mature and reasonable. Get a grip guys. I'm a vegetarian, and I have no gripe with deer huntersIF, they do indeed eat the meat. Deer are not an endangered species. Hunting for sport however, it not cool.
-
Enigmatic-Ocean — 11 years ago(February 05, 2015 03:20 AM)
I never said I was confused. You only assume I am because I don't agree with you. Are you a vegetarian? Because if you aren't you are being a hypocrite. The way that chickens, pigs and cows are killed in order to provide food for the masses is way more inhumane than a gun shot. Chickens have their head cut off, baby chickens are put on a conveyor belt and ground up, pigs have their throats slit while they are alive and most cows are skinned and cut apart while they are still alive. Companies that produce food do not have a humane way in which they kill the animals that they sell for human consumption. So, if you eat meat you are adding to that-FACT. And just because someone eats at a diner doesn't mean that they aren't going to eat something that they shot. Again, you are assuming something in order to make it fit into the paradigm of what you want it to be. Also, strapping an animal that a hunter has just shot onto the hood of a car is a normal way of transportation. That method of transportation has been used since the invention of the automobile. I have no idea why you do not understand that. Do you have any idea how big a full grown buck is? It is too big to fit into the backseat or in the trunk of a car. The fact that you wanted the Starman to shoot the hunters shows the flaw in your brain. By wishing that you missed the entire point of the movie.
Further debate with you is pointless since it is obvious that you have a mental flaw.
VHS>DVD -
SamuelLJedi — 11 years ago(February 05, 2015 06:32 AM)
The flaw in my brain? Wow you went straight to name calling on the Internet too. How mature. Way to lose all credibility. For the record I said Jenny should have shot them hunters which she almost was about to since they were in the process of beating Starman to death.
-
06986 — 11 years ago(February 05, 2015 05:37 PM)
You wanted her to shoot the hunters because you hate hunters/hunting and the stereotypical way they were portrayed in the movie just reassured you hate for people you don't understand or really know anything about. You would rather see the hunters dying as revenge for killing a animal legally that has overpopulated the US or you claim the hunters should be killed because they were beating up a guy who just basically stole/hid what the guy rightfully hunted, shot, and moved to put on his vehicle(they did not see him bring it back to life) which makes you just as sadistic if not much worse as those hunters portrayed in the movie.
Hollywood almost always portrays hunters as sadistic ignorant redneck killers and are the villains in scenes to get a desired response from immature viewers like you Samuel and they succeeded in doing it here.
Sport Hunters eat what they shoot or donate the meat to the less fortunate, they just go after bigger game/bigger racks, they don't just shoot things to kill them for the hell of it. Hunters are not starving/poor and humbly need to put deer meat on the table to survive and cry over what they shoot like what many anti hunters feel is the only acceptable scenario for hunting either. They do it because they like the experience, being out in nature, eating clean meat they took, and the thrill of the hunt but over emotional people like you don't understand that, you see someone celebrating or smiling after they cleanly hunted and killed an animal and it invokes a psychotic reaction in you that you want to kill hunters or root for them to die.
In reality the deer did not die in the movie, it was fake, they were not hunters either, they were actors given lines to come off as unlikeable as possible for a desired response from the writer/producer/director for people like you. Hopefully you can understand the difference between real hunters and the overly negative Hollywood versions of hunters that invoke such insane reactions from you and other self loathing peta nutjob types. -
SamuelLJedi — 11 years ago(February 05, 2015 06:46 PM)
I don't know. But the film wasn't about vegetarianism. Unless vegetarianism is about valuing life enough not to desecrate it on the hood of a car and act like a stone age jerk when a miracle happens in front of your eyes.