Why is this movie so appealing?
-
crispy_comments — 15 years ago(July 26, 2010 01:55 AM)
I heard the soundtrack first, liked the songs so much I had to check out the movie - always interested in obscure 80s films. Once I got used to it (and stopped asking myself stuff like, "where's Diane Lane? She's barely in this! Are we gonna get deeper characterization/more dialogue or what?) - I started to enjoy the atmosphere. It is like an alternate timeline 50s/80s setting and the storytelling's sort of stylized like a comic book. Like a comic book, the visuals are key, the characters are kind of basic and the dialogue is kind of cheesy but it's all kind of cool anyway.
And McCoy is so funny and kickass. Love her. Love the ending which can be interpreted however you want - as two sparring partners/buddies going off to have more adventures or possibly as a future couple, more suited for eachother due to camaradarie and common background/goals I mean, Ellen Aim seems to represent the young love/one who got away/fantasy object whereas McCoy is more real and down-to-earth and likely to be a long-term thing. Lacking the "epic" star-crossed quality, but more attainable and sustainable, y'know? It seems like Tom's walking away from Ellen (and the song that's playing and fades away) is symbolic of leaving his youth behind, and it's a bit bittersweet, like thinking of an old high-school crush or something - but just because that first passion didn't work out, doesn't mean your life is over and then the ending turns happy, when McCoy drives upthe future looks bright.
I'm a sap. But it's a feel-good movie. And the music really does make you feel like rock and roll can save your life. -
daja_ace — 15 years ago(July 27, 2010 10:44 PM)
I heard the soundtrack first, liked the songs so much I had to check out the movie - always interested in obscure 80s films. Once I got used to it (and stopped asking myself stuff like, "where's Diane Lane? She's barely in this! Are we gonna get deeper characterization/more dialogue or what?) - I started to enjoy the atmosphere. It is like an alternate timeline 50s/80s setting and the storytelling's sort of stylized like a comic book. Like a comic book, the visuals are key, the characters are kind of basic and the dialogue is kind of cheesy but it's all kind of cool anyway.
lol. Cool. I didn't think that this film was incredibly deep or anything but it was well made and was a fun diversion for just less than 2 hours. I've also heard the comic book comparisons about the setting. I think it's a good comparison.
Walter Hill, who made this movie also made
The Warriors
. If you haven't already seen it, you may want to check it out too. Even though, it's technically a 70's movie (released in 1979) and not an obscure 80's film.
And McCoy is so funny and kickass. Love her. Love the ending which can be interpreted however you want - as two sparring partners/buddies going off to have more adventures or possibly as a future couple, more suited for eachother due to camaradarie and common background/goals I mean, Ellen Aim seems to represent the young love/one who got away/fantasy object whereas McCoy is more real and down-to-earth and likely to be a long-term thing. Lacking the "epic" star-crossed quality, but more attainable and sustainable, y'know? It seems like Tom's walking away from Ellen (and the song that's playing and fades away) is symbolic of leaving his youth behind, and it's a bit bittersweet, like thinking of an old high-school crush or something - but just because that first passion didn't work out, doesn't mean your life is over and then the ending turns happy, when McCoy drives upthe future looks bright.
Yeah, that's a cool perspective and one way of looking at it.
I'm a sap. But it's a feel-good movie. And the music really does make you feel like rock and roll can save your life.
lol. I'm glad that you enjoyed it. -
cecile_p — 15 years ago(July 30, 2010 11:39 AM)
I was 19 when I saw this in the theaters. I had never heard of it and it was shown as a double feature, where this was the lesser known of the two. I wanted to see it because I had been a fan of Diane Lane since "A Little Romance". From what I overheard from people in the theater, this movie blew away the other one!
Of course I loved it, for multiple reasons: Diane Lane is a fabulous actress and I always wanted to look like her. Michael Pare was so dreamy as the strong but silent kick-butt hero. Willem Dafoe was sooo creepy scary as the bad guy. Amy Madigan totally rocked as the unique side kick and was the biggest surprise by far. Rick Moranis was hilarious as Fish. And add to this all the great side characters: Lee Ving, Elizabeth Daily, Richard Lawson, Bill Paxtonthe list goes on!
Beyond the great characters that these actors/actresses brought to life, the 50's style with a post-apocalypse urban 80's feel, the great music, slices of life from various club/bar scenes and very entertaining fight sequences all merge together to give this a legend sort of feel. And since it's billed as a Rock n Roll Fable, I wasn't looking for anything deep but enjoyed it for what it was. As such, it is delightful!
I showed this movie to a (much younger) friend of mine who loves all kinds of music and though he called the movie cheesy, he said that it was good cheese and he totally got drawn into it. I'm glad I finally found it on DVD so that I can watch it as much as I like or lend it to friends who haven't had the pleasure of enjoying this overlooked little gem. -
-
docnakona — 16 years ago(March 27, 2010 09:01 PM)
Notice how many folks on this thread are putting how old they were when the movie came out? Well, I was 21 then and 1984 was one of the very best years of my life. So I think its more about capturing a moment of when we were coming of age and especially the music brings those memories and images roaring back.
-
statum106 — 15 years ago(July 14, 2010 04:38 PM)
I just turned 15 when SOF was released. I missed it during it's initial run but they ran it to death on cable (just like "The Beastmaster"). It was also as staple on syndicated TV when I was in college in Atlanta.
While the film's straightforward, it's a mish-mash of sights and sounds. The music's great (Ry Cooder, Dan Hartman, The Blasters & The Fixx) and so's everyone in the flick. The action is top notch (sledgehammers, they're fighting with sledgehammers?) and the dialogue is priceless ("You're making this real hard on yourself. You act nice, you and me fall in love for a week or two and then I let you go.")
Box office non-withstanding, I consider SOF to be a must for anyone who admires Walter Hill as a director. I'm actually impressed he did so much under a PG rating. -
ucla-usc — 15 years ago(July 15, 2010 04:52 PM)
There are movies that just grab you, sometimes for reasons hard to define. For me, this is one of them. It is very much a Western, think Clint Eastwood in Pale Rider. The music, which I was fortunately able to enjoy before I lost my hearing, was powerful, moving stuff. I think Michael Pare did his best work in Eddie and the Cruisers and SOF, and am sorry he did not appear to have the range to do more. And Diane Lane was, to me, at her most gorgeous in this film. Moranis and Dafoe and Madigan were all great too. Again, this was a FABLE. Clearly labeled as such. And to me, overwhelmingly successful as that. I never tire of watching it, even though now it is with subtitles. And that final scene is one of the all time barn-burners. Just magnificent.
-
sisterdebmac — 15 years ago(July 15, 2010 05:37 PM)
Another excellently written comment. I'm so sorry about your hearing. I lost the hearing in my left ear when I was 3 and had chronic infections for many years that would often clog my "good ear" and steal the sound from my world for weeks at a stretch. So far, I've always been fortunate enough to regain my hearing on the right when the infections cleared up. I adore sound and music, so I treasure them and know how precious that gift is. And how tenuous.
If you don't mind me asking, how did you lose your hearing?
Let me tell you a little story. You're an idiot!
-
ozymandias312 — 15 years ago(September 27, 2010 10:40 PM)
:o( Alas! I too am mostly deaf in my right ear, largely due to my Army experience (all kinds of gunfire and explosions, even though it was only "practice"), but also from playing too much with guns and things that went "Boom!" before and after that on my own time, fool that I was. :o(
I wish all my fellow sufferers the best of luck with their hearing. May God someday open all ears that are shut.
Anyone who is at all into shooting, seriously, double up on the hearing protection. I mean use both ear plugs AND ear-muffs over them too. Deafness is very lonely.
Ozy
And I stood where I did be; for there was no more use to run; And again I lookt with my hope gone. -
krichadams — 13 years ago(May 05, 2012 02:18 PM)
The simplest answer is that it was one of those movies that captured the moment of the times when it came out. I was in my 20s back in the mid 1980s. The clubs had mostly either the spandex, neon colors, spiked hair, Prince's "Purple Rain" look. Or a mixed/updated/leather/punk 1950s look. Mainly depended which club you hung around. I first saw the movie on this new-fangled pay channel called "H-B-O," and watch it every time it comes on to bring back the memories1
-
moviefanatics81 — 13 years ago(May 08, 2012 01:10 AM)
Because it's a unique movie that makes you wonder what time period it's set in. The beginning says that it happens in another time and another place.
Michael Pare, Diane Lane, Willem Dafoe, Amy Madigan, and Rick Moranis were convincing in their roles.
Although Diane Lane was lip syncing, she put so much emotion in the music performances.
I like how the dancer named Marin (who did most of the dancing in "Flashdance") got to do a brief dance during the club scene.
The first and last songs were my favorite ones on this soundtrack. I also love "I Can Dream About You." The first song "Going Nowhere Fast" was the song that my favorite aerobics instructor would sometimes play. -
vimhawk — 13 years ago(June 23, 2012 08:14 AM)
I saw this again for the first time in ages a couple of days ago. When I analyse the components of this film, most of them are unconvincing. The strange 'out of time' setting is just that, strange, the performances are adequate, a lot of the dialogue is very poor but then I realise that the clich "greater than the sum of its parts" has probably never been better used. It's just a really good, fun, entertaining film. What more could you want?