Kelly Lebrock today

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Woman in Red

---

trotsky88 — 17 years ago(June 16, 2008 09:22 AM)

Wouldn't be cool if this Kelly, as she is today, would have her dress blown up bt a wind vent?
http://thegrumpiest.com/?p=5987

[fgadmin]

CBikle — 17 years ago(November 03, 2008 05:58 PM)

That's what being married to Steven Segall will do to you.
Seriously though, she still looks hot.

[fgadmin]

JasonIK75 — 17 years ago(December 30, 2008 05:28 PM)

Sad that she never got another great role after this movie and Weird Science.

[fgadmin]

sweiland75 — 17 years ago(February 01, 2009 03:58 AM)

It's hard to tell what she really looks like, underneath those clothes.
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
You can help change the world.

[fgadmin]

trotsky88 — 16 years ago(June 18, 2009 03:58 PM)

You can tell she has a very big butt, and she has a protruding stomach. It sticks out.

[fgadmin]

Lolo1976 — 13 years ago(November 18, 2012 03:50 AM)

Dude, she's 52 years old with three children you expected her to still have a flat stomach & perfect butt? Really now.
Not to mention, her butt wasn't exactly tiny even back in the day - she's always been a curvy woman!

[fgadmin]

jogbike — 16 years ago(July 11, 2009 09:57 AM)

Amen. She was great in both.

[fgadmin]

thenicnic — 16 years ago(July 30, 2009 03:21 PM)

Loce this film, but one flaw I notice: her stilettos would get caught in the vent, would they not?

[fgadmin]

msilva7-1 — 16 years ago(January 08, 2010 12:43 AM)

I DON'T EVEN GO FOR FATSO WOMEN BUT KELLY REALLY DOESN'T LOOK BAD AT ALL. MOST WOMEN ANY AGE ARE FATTER THAN HER IN THE US. SHE ISN'T POSING FOR THE PIC, THAT'S ALL I CAN MAKE OF THESE UNKIND WORDS.

[fgadmin]

MALENIUXRIVERS — 14 years ago(February 09, 2012 07:57 PM)

remember , she was 24 in WOMAN IN RED..shes now 52, you cant expect her to be the same as the movie..