that was quite intense
-
Formerly_dead_cops — 9 years ago(December 02, 2016 05:32 PM)
Same, that's how it's obvious that he was behind it - the desperation to get his wife home (why, when he's been going through a celibate phase) and telling the robbers immediately that the money was upstairs - even mick found that weird. Why would a former soldier cave in that quickly and allow them to go where he knew his mum, wife and baby brother was.
Too obvious that he was involved it in but reaaaally can't see how him and Oz went from being enemies to him suddenly agreeing to help him rob his family's business to help pay off a debt
And poor johnny, literally made a two second appearance only to be knocked out
I've never had my dick looked at by any woman
-Kings_Rule Innit -
stevenmorrisseyx — 9 years ago(December 02, 2016 03:34 PM)
Yes it was and I can sense Mick might recognize the guy? Mick is a smart man IF he finds out his son Lee is behind this robbery he will NEVER forgive him. And Whitney how will she ever look at Lee the same again?
-
mrssutherland2013 — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 04:42 AM)
I also think Lee was behind it for all the previous reasons stated, I know Lee and this oz don't get on but i think they've called a truce off screen and the money has been "stolen" for Lee.
Or that the two of them have an agreement I.e there's something in it for oz.
cArNiVaLs oF fAyGo -
I_Said_Over_EazZzy — 9 years ago(December 03, 2016 11:27 AM)
Eastenders fails again.. Here's the identities of them:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3997158/Mystery-solved-EastEnders-fans-left-hysterics-spoils-cliffhanger-revealing-identity-masked-robbers-closing-credits.html