So many things wrong here, I may as well go down a list:
-
HereMyDear — 10 years ago(September 24, 2015 08:47 PM)
No sir, that is not a "fact." It's an opinion; a biased and speculative one, based on what you choose to see and want to think. What is a FACT is that ANOES3 is and has always been an overall better reviewed and received movie than ANOES2, and that Fred was written to be more organized and forceful in it than in the latter. All this spiel you're babbling on about what is "vast minority," "MTV" and "hip" is futile and doesn't mean anything. Fred was more serious in the second movie. Sure. Who denied that? But serious =/= scary. My position stands: Fred is scariest when he is his most self-sustained and powerful, and for all of his "seriousness" those are traits that he tends to lack in ANOES2, which renders him less scary in it.
-
Durham_christine — 9 years ago(October 27, 2016 11:20 AM)
I'm actually with you. I don't like Dream Warriors at all. It was good until Kristen second dream,then it goes downhill from there. Nancy looks terrible in that one. It wasn't worth bringing her back. It has such cheesy lines ("In my dreams I'm the wizard master!", gimmie a break), it's so dated and becomes more like Captain Planet and the Planeteers. It's seems far less a threat when it's all these kids at once against Freddy. And Nancy's death was the stupidest ever. She really believed Freddy was dead just because the mirrors broke? Yeah right. Freddy'd Dead and 3 are the worst for me.
-
-
Durham_christine — 9 years ago(October 30, 2016 06:23 PM)
That's alright. It's your opinion and you're more than entitled to it. Personally i can't see how anyone can like 3. It's cheesy and so dated. The lines are cringeworthy. I'm so glad they didn't end it there.
Got to agree with FD. That was awful and not even funny in the slightest. New Nightmare? That was a masterpiece -
TheComeUp — 10 years ago(October 09, 2015 08:07 AM)
The problem with this movie is that Jack Sholder and David Chaskin are both hacks who NLC hired for the sake of cost effectiveness. In more capable hands, the plot here may have been salvageable and perhaps not so disconnected from what part one established, but these two had no sense of east and west and it shows on screen. They were trying to turn an rough draft script that cried for a rewrite into a movie. The actors look frustrated and inconvenienced. Half the reason Freddy is so pokerfaced in this movie is because Englund was irritated. The whole thing was mediocre. Just imagine what this could have been had Craven returned.
-
nohac — 10 years ago(October 12, 2015 08:22 AM)
Nancy should have been there. That's why pt 3 feels like the real 1st sequel. Even if all the clumsy and illogical things remained, i think Nancy being there would've added enough familiarity to make those things not so off putting.
-
HereMyDear — 10 years ago(October 13, 2015 06:33 AM)
There wouldn't have been a movie if Nancy had been there because she would have taken Krueger down in the first twenty minutes. Any of the series protagonists (Nancy, Kristen, Alice, Maggie, Laurie) would have easily beat Freddy Revenge Freddy because he was all bluster.
-
AdrianLePier — 9 years ago(May 06, 2016 07:11 AM)
Agree. The movie actually becomes a little more interesting when it's Freddy vs. Lisawhich is what it SHOULD have been from the beginning. It's obvious she (and Grady) were "Elm Street children". Making this focal point of the movie about Jesse was its biggest mistake.