THIS MOVIE SUCKS!!!!!
-
Absolved — 11 years ago(May 14, 2014 12:30 PM)
No, Revenge is bad to those who know what a bad movie is. "No intellect," LOLplease. With all the
obvious
flaws and plotholes in FR, only someone with a lack of intellect would seriously convince themselves that this clunker is at all good. -
Absolved — 11 years ago(May 29, 2014 05:18 AM)
Actually in the context to which the OP uses it, 'aerial mess' makes total sense. The atmosphere, the way the scenes were produced and overall tone of this movie were haphazard as hell. Next time check yourself before challenging someone else's wordplay, you just made yourself look stupid trying to call him/her out.
-
AdrianLePier — 11 years ago(June 11, 2014 07:48 PM)
I think if you ignore that this is a sequel and take it in as a stand alone film, it's much easier to digest. It's when you try to make it fit in with the rest of the movies that it comes off as weird, out of step and sort of the red headed step child.
Freddy's Revenge is basically the "Khloe Kardashian" of the ANOES series.
THE TALK ASYLUMComing in September!
-
Absolved — 11 years ago(June 27, 2014 05:56 PM)
I think if you ignore that this is a sequel and take it in as a stand alone film, it's much easier to digest.
Since this movie is part of the series and has the distinction of being the very first sequel, I simply can't do that. All eyes were on this movie after the success of the first, and it failed. -
strikeback — 11 years ago(March 03, 2015 10:04 AM)
Agreed! This crappy movie made next to no sense and had no theme or story continuity. It is like a run on sentence, with all sorts of spelling and structural flubs, that is badly in need of proofreading. A real decline from the brilliance of the original by Wes Craven and upstaged terribly by the much better made part 3. Nothing was developed to completion. Everything about it screams "first draft." An embarrassment. If not for the awesome Robert Englund doing the best he could with this rubbish, it wouldn't have ANY redeeming qualities.
-
evabba — 11 years ago(March 17, 2015 12:30 PM)
Well this is just one out of a series of bad to horrible sequels.
I still prefer this one over the unscary "Dream Child" and the worst of them all IMO "Freddy's Dead". This one is at least atmospheric and dark.
Trying to find logic in this franchise though is pointless. These film's make no sense. Each sequel just finds a ridiculous reason to resurrect Freddy and each sequel has an even more ridiculous way of eliminating him (at least for that sequel). I still can't figure out how Freddy was defeated in "The Dream Master" by just looking in a mirror. Yeah.. ok. -
AdrianLePier — 9 years ago(January 24, 2017 05:31 AM)
I still can't figure out how Freddy was defeated in "The Dream Master" by just looking in a mirror. Yeah.. ok.
Evil being unable to cope with its own reflection is pretty standard in the world of horror. Especially for someone as cockily malevolent as Freddy. I'm not all surprised that it was enough to destroy him. -
hurricanehorton — 9 years ago(January 24, 2017 06:33 AM)
Evil being unable to cope with its own reflection is pretty standard in the world of horror. Especially for someone as cockily malevolent as Freddy. I'm not all surprised that it was enough to destroy him.
In my opinion, Freddy's Dead had the most anticlimactic conclusion. It wasn't the worst death, per se, but they'd hyped up that this was finally it. This time, Freddy couldn't be resurrected. He's never ever coming back, this is OFFICIALLY THE END OF FREDDY!!!!!!
And then he gets stabbed, and that was it. I somehow was expecting them to find a way of destroying Freddy for good. But they didn't, they just stabbed him. -
Slug Bait — 4 years ago(November 07, 2021 09:05 PM)
Still better than the wildly overrated 3rd movie. At least Freddy isn't a wisecracking goofball in this like he is from Dream Warriors and beyond. They still tried to actually make him scary in this.
Just because I'm not on THEIR side, doesn't mean I'm on YOURS.