Paradox??
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Flight of the Navigator
realniceclark — 17 years ago(October 13, 2008 12:16 PM)
Probably the wrong word to use but it sounded cool so I thought it would work. OK originally David is sent back to his planet 8 years later but without aging. At the end he travels back in time 8 years into the past where he started from. Here's my question, what happens in 8 years from that point? Does the "other" David from the first time appear? Would there be 2 Davids or did I miss it completely?
-
funkiste — 17 years ago(October 14, 2008 07:43 AM)
No I don't think that would happen because he didn't just travel in time, he changed time. By going back in time to his original "time zone", he therefore erases the fact that he was abducted for 8 years and therefore isn't missing and doesn't turn up 8 years later (because in David's timeline, that's already happened (the movie), but in everyone else's timeline, he was never missing in the first place).
I used to feel really sorry for the family that he leaves behind in the "future", but I now realise that by going back and joining his family in his original time line, the "future" family without David ceases to exist and instead becomes whatever it becomes with David having been around all along.
I'm aware that's not a flawless explanation, but since this is a kids film that's how I choose to look at it. -
giospurs — 17 years ago(March 18, 2009 09:08 AM)
This doesn't really make sense. If you can change time then it would create a parallel universe, where David was abducted.
The "future" David-less family would still have grieved for him for 8 years, even if you did say that timeline was 'erased'.
The fact that David saw them, means they do exist somewhere. I don't really think you can erase that suffering by changing time. It still happened. -
voyagerandsouthpark — 16 years ago(December 23, 2009 01:19 PM)
correction, he was still abducted and taken to where he was taken , at the same time the david from the future was returned not long after the original was abducted, then 8 years later the original david comes back, so there are 2 david's existing at the same time, so how exactly does david being returned AFTER he was abducted change the fact that he WAS abducted?
"sir, sir, i gotta check and see if you've soiled yourself, I'll get to you in a moment, sir!" -
voyagerandsouthpark — 15 years ago(August 05, 2010 03:46 PM)
Where does he change the timeline that he gets kidnapped, he gets taken to a point in time about 5 minutes AFTER he was kidnapped, he only changed the future, not the past. A David will appear in 8 years time and the events of the film will be different, creating multiple timelines which will unravel the fabric of reality itself and possible blow up the galaxy, hopefully it will only be this one, which would be some relief. Great Scott.
"sir, sir, i gotta check and see if you've soiled yourself, I'll get to you in a moment, sir!" -
crs_unlimited — 17 years ago(November 25, 2008 09:21 AM)
Technically you are right. This is a paradox. David is returned to his original time at the end of the movie. Therefore he would never have been reported as missing in the first place. There should have been an older David in the future as he was returned.
On a side note. He didn't time travel 8 years into the future. It took 8 years on earth for him to go to Alpha Centauri and be experimented on and then brought back. He hasn't aged because of the theory that when you travel faster then the speed of light time slows down for the traveler. -
timgdx — 16 years ago(January 29, 2010 01:50 AM)
He hasn't aged because of the theory that when you travel faster then the speed of light time slows down for the traveler.
More precisely, and it's not theory, when you travel at any speed time slows down for the travel. Time dilation is only apparent at speeds approaching the speed of light. The assumption is that at speeds FASTER than light, time reverses. -
imdba1 — 16 years ago(January 29, 2010 02:24 PM)
Actually, it is a theory in the strict sense of the term. Time dilation has been observed on trans-Atlantic flights.
One interesting thought that I've had about this is what stops different parts of one's body from existing in different times? While it might not be perceptible, there would still be some. If you move your arm back and forth, it is traveling at a different speed. -
PsychoDragonX99 — 16 years ago(March 17, 2010 11:09 PM)
might not be a "paradox" but a really severe and possibly head-exploding headache trying to figure it out altogether! LOL.
But yes, I believe one of the other posters explained it best (forget which one). David was abducted & placed on a separate timeline than his own. He was "missing" for 8 years, and since he would most likely be labelled "David-Prime" (meaning original or #1), David-Prime was simply returned to his own time a slightly later than falling into the trench.
Max the ship/computer simply just placed him in the same area as the trench, just was off by a few years. -
cjsks — 15 years ago(June 02, 2010 08:49 AM)
You are correct. However, just to clarify, traveling forward in time is entirely possible. As you accelerate toward the speed of light, time slows down. This effect is observed everyday on a small scale, on satellites in orbit, particle accelerators (like the large haldron collider), etc.
Going back in time, at the end of the movie that's the paradox. -
Fozzy_Fozzbourne — 14 years ago(January 28, 2012 10:45 AM)
How about going with the Parallel Universe idea, and Max and David landed in a parallel universe.
Anything that can happen, will happen, so what are the chances of jumping into a parallel universe, a place where an alternate david was missing for 8 years and simply goes nack to hia reality where he was missing for 2 hours -
3PocketCharlie — 14 years ago(February 07, 2012 12:15 PM)
In stories where paradox is not directly addressed, I take it like this: David left 1978 and came back in 1986. He was in 1986 for a few days. Then he went back in time to 1978. For the few days, that timeline existed only for David (and Max). No one else would ever experience that timeline.
All glory to the Hypnotoad -
10fttall — 14 years ago(March 04, 2012 05:49 AM)
I agree with this interpretation. Even though David travels back to 1978, he does not do this until the end of the movie, so technically, those few days in 1986 took place "before" David is returned to his family on July 4, 1978. Therefore, there is no 20 year old David in the 1986 that is shown in the movie.
-
ispamforfood — 13 years ago(November 28, 2012 12:46 PM)
The answer lies in what those in the movie "Deja Vu" call the "branching universe theory" Or the Many-worlds Interpretation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation
Right now, we are alive And in this moment, I swear We are infinite.