Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. The little red-haired girl…

The little red-haired girl…

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
24 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    agtac76 — 20 years ago(April 04, 2006 12:36 PM)

    Thanks for the info! It all sounds depressing to me. This reads like it would become a really good soap opera!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      estella2 — 19 years ago(April 14, 2006 12:14 AM)

      wow!~that was Catherine! and the whole time i thought it was elizabeth. amazing! thanks to those who posted this

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        IsoldeJaneHolland — 19 years ago(September 14, 2006 07:15 PM)

        I thought it was Elizabeth too, and I have a degree in history! I was
        puzzled because yes I knew that Elizabeth was several years older
        than Jane. I think because that little girl looks just like Princess
        Elizabeth in the twelve zillion movies made about her. I just assumed
        the producers had gotten their history mixed up. That happens a lot.
        In Cate Blanchett's Elizabeth the pivotal character of Sir William Cecil
        is played by 70ish actor Sir Richard Attenborough. Cecil was only a
        few years older than Elizabeth, and was thus 30 or so at the time of
        the events depicted.
        In view of Catherine's future it's rather sad that we see her playing
        wistfully with a baby doll, and knowing she would in the future be
        forced to endure seperation from her children and husband.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          reesieg — 19 years ago(January 06, 2007 06:38 PM)

          Elizabeth's abuse of her cousin Catherine is one of the things I like least about her, though on balance I am in awe of Elizabeth. Just because Elizabeth couldn't put herslf in the position to marry, why torment everyone else? I would have thought that Elizabeth would have been pleased to have a Protestant male cousin available as heir, as an alternative to Mary Queen of Scots. Though I suppose Elizabeth instead saw Catherine's sons as a threat.
          In addition, Jane & Catherine's grandmother - Henry VIII's favorite sister Mary hated Elizabeth's mother, Anne Boleyn. Mary died in 1533, just before Elizabeth was born, but Mary stuck up for Henry's first wife Catherine of Aragon until the end. That gave Elizabeth one more reason to dislike the Greys.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            queen-smartass — 19 years ago(January 20, 2007 11:46 AM)

            The problem with a Protestant heir for Elizabeth is very simple. She was well aware from her own experience as an heir to the throne just how dangerous it was to have 'competition' as it were. As soon as Elizabeth named a successor, her position as Queen would have been even more tenuous. There would have been even more plots to remove her than were already in place. The fact that Katherine married a Seymour (same house as that of Queen Jane, third wife of Henry VIII) made the offspring that much more dangerous.
            Remember, Elizabeth was viewed by many as a bastard, possibly not even Henry VIII's daughter. Her position was never really secure.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              katieowens12 — 19 years ago(February 05, 2007 04:57 AM)

              The reason you automaticaly think it is elizabeth is that she is wearing an almost identical dress to the portrait of young elizabeth that is so well known

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                IsoldeJaneHolland — 19 years ago(March 13, 2007 08:38 AM)

                That portrait is extraordinary, and her self-contained poise astonishing
                in a girl of thirteen.
                Isn't it interesting that when King Edward collapses Jane has a panic
                attack and paces about repeating "What do I do?" while her younger sister
                prompty rushes to his aid and holds him until his attendants can reach
                them? Jane is too flustered to offer any help. I wonder if the director
                wanted to make a point about Jane being too high strung and over-sensitive?
                Katherine Grey secretly married Edward Seymour, Earl of Hereford, the
                nephew of Queen Jane Seymour, King Edward's mother.
                Remember the Tudors had usurped the throne themselves in 1485, and their
                origins were a 'romantic' secret liason and marriage between the young
                widowed Queen Katherine of Valois and her household usher, the Welsh
                bard Owen Tudor. Her son by Henry V became King at nine months old and
                Katherine shipped off to (they thought!) sleepy retirement at a country
                estate by the Protector and Regent. But when she died ten years later
                and they went to inventory her possessions, they found three little
                kids. And less than fifty years later the son of one of them decided
                he would make a better king than the Plantagenets who had ruled England
                for 330 years. So I guess Elizabeth had every right to be concerned,
                although her policies made it pretty miserable for young ladies like
                the Grey girls and Arabella Stuart who were unfortunate enough to
                have royal blood in their veins.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  unicornlvr2005 — 18 years ago(February 15, 2008 06:17 PM)

                  Is she supposed to be Elizabeth I? She seems too young since she is younger than Edward and Elizabeth was a few years older.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    little_miss_sunnydale — 18 years ago(February 16, 2008 08:37 AM)

                    I thought it was supposed to be Jane's younger sister, Katherine Grey. The girl is too young to be Elizabeth.
                    Noli me tangere; for Caesar's I am

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      mrsramthun — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 02:32 PM)

                      I don't think so , because elizabeth was older than edward.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        singingstarlet — 18 years ago(March 09, 2008 09:37 AM)

                        We all know how hollywood loves to make mistakes and create revisionist history. It is possible that they could've meant it to be Elizabeth.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          SupernovaGemini2 — 18 years ago(March 12, 2008 10:18 PM)

                          lol, I asked this question a couple of years ago. 🙂 I've checked the cast, and there is no Elizabeth listed, but there is a Katherine Grey. So I think it's a fair assumption that the mysterious red-haired girl is in fact Jane's younger sister Katherine.


                          "The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." ~Qui-Gon Jinn, The Phantom Menace

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups