Is she supposed to be Elizabeth I? She seems too young since she is younger than Edward and Elizabeth was a few years ol

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Lady Jane

---

unicornlvr2005 — 18 years ago(February 15, 2008 06:17 PM)

Is she supposed to be Elizabeth I? She seems too young since she is younger than Edward and Elizabeth was a few years older.

[fgadmin]

little_miss_sunnydale — 18 years ago(February 16, 2008 08:37 AM)

I thought it was supposed to be Jane's younger sister, Katherine Grey. The girl is too young to be Elizabeth.
Noli me tangere; for Caesar's I am

[fgadmin]

mrsramthun — 17 years ago(June 13, 2008 02:32 PM)

I don't think so , because elizabeth was older than edward.

[fgadmin]

singingstarlet — 18 years ago(March 09, 2008 09:37 AM)

We all know how hollywood loves to make mistakes and create revisionist history. It is possible that they could've meant it to be Elizabeth.

[fgadmin]

SupernovaGemini2 — 18 years ago(March 12, 2008 10:18 PM)

lol, I asked this question a couple of years ago. I've checked the cast, and there is no Elizabeth listed, but there is a Katherine Grey. So I think it's a fair assumption that the mysterious red-haired girl is in fact Jane's younger sister Katherine.

---

"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." ~Qui-Gon Jinn, The Phantom Menace