Tarantino will remake in 2009! OFFICIAL!!
-
callernumber666 — 18 years ago(March 24, 2008 01:29 AM)
You are going to have to provide a more detailed link to the info gave.. the only info regarding Tarantino and LTZ on the wiki link you posted was this-
Director Quentin Tarantino has expressed interest in filming a much more faithful adaptation of the book.
How does that confirm a remake for 2009?
I myself would not like to see a remake done, as I love the original, and Hollywood is spewing out too many re-makes already.
As a Tarantino fan I say 'Quentin, please dont fall into the remake trap, and get busy writing something new!'
You're Perfect Yes It's True. But Without Me You're Only You -
The_Crimson_Pig — 17 years ago(April 16, 2008 02:34 PM)
As far as I'm concerned it wouldn't be a remake, it would be a second chance for a great book to get the film it deserves. This film was like someone was eager to make the film and became terrified of it, the book wasn't a formulaic 'say no to drugs' story. The main character would wake up and snort 2 lines of coke and constantly ask himself "Should I snort the rest of my coke now or later?"
A remake could be more than an average 80s film, it could be a great social satire. Hell, Julian doesn't even appear in the book that much, it would be a totally different movie. The relationship with Blair is a whole other story, it's like they couldn't be bothered with it, it's one of the best parts of the novel.
Last Film Seen: Amadeus
"Either Uwe Boll goes or I do" Oscar Wilde -
livingdead70 — 17 years ago(April 22, 2008 07:16 PM)
Leave stuff alone !!!!
A remake , will be full of bad acting horrilbe rap music and just really doesnt need to exist. They will skew it towards teenagers and that will kill it.
The orignal is fine, write something new for a change. -
The_Crimson_Pig — 17 years ago(April 25, 2008 07:46 AM)
The original was not fine! Read the beep book. A lot of people have read the book and thought "This would make a good movie", then it was a movie that wasn't even close to the book.
Not only that, but this movie was poorly written.
Surely it says something to you that the author of the book was so ashamed of what they did to his story that he didn't attend the premiere.
Last Film Seen: Casablanca
"Either Uwe Boll goes or I do" Oscar Wilde -
projectcyclops — 17 years ago(May 02, 2008 09:17 AM)
Tarantino would be all wrong, plus he's not made a good film since 1997. Avery's Rules of Attraction didn't work because it too Tarantino-ish. American Psycho is the best screen adaptation so far (not seen The Informers yet).
I'm all for a re-make (or re-boot or re-imagining, whatever) of Less Than Zero, but a less gimmicky director would suit better. All of this, just my opinion. -
findanddestroyatlantis — 17 years ago(May 13, 2008 02:12 PM)
This movie needs to be done true to the novel rather it's Tarantino or someone else. The people who don't want it to be "remade" seem to act like it's some sort of classic, when in fact it's just a mediocre movie based on a good book.
Apart from the character's names, the setting and a few other details this movie isn't at all like the book and I'd love to see someone take a crack at Ellis' story in earnest. -
ohmixmaster — 17 years ago(September 13, 2008 02:54 AM)
LTZ was in and of itself a good film. It was a total downer with fantastic performances from Robert Downey Jr., and James Spader. Jami Gertz was a perfect Blair (except for the dark hair). She was beautiful in a way words cannot describe, nieve, confused, dumb, and a little off. I didn't like McCarthy as Clay, but the way the movie was written (basically a "rock against drugs"/nancy regan "just say no" film) he played the part beautifully. Now, obviously Clay was a different guy in the book, but this movie was not the book in hardly any aspect. The film did alot of things correctly: the locations, sets, cars, clothes, clubs, lighting, photography, overall tone and editing were perfect, and did the book proud. However, the story, characters, and hair (the book constantly said blonde blonde and more blonde..he he) were all wrong, and were a slap in the face of BEE. This book could be made into a movie, and, if they actually follow the book, I wouldn't consider it a remake at all, because the first movie was NOT LTZ. If QT does it, than I hope he hires BEE to write the screenplay. Who knows, if James SPader looses some weight (hello low carb), and RDJr gets off the coke, they might even be able to reprise their roles, because both were terrific in the original. I for one would love to see the book made into a movie.
"Religion is the opium of the people" - Karl Marx -
clean_plastic_child — 17 years ago(October 02, 2008 10:41 PM)
The LTZ movie was totally off from the book. It was a lame movie with good acting on Andrew and Robert's parts, but I was pulling at couch cushions and gritting my teeth just so I wouldn't ruin it for the people watching it who haven't read the book. Whoever made that so-so movie should have called the it something else and given the characters different names. The fact that a few details from the book made it into the movie ticked me off even more! Robert Downey Jr. may have done a good job as a cokehead, but who in Hollywood hasn't done coke? Gimme a break! To me, it's horrible that he almost ruined his life being involved in such a bad movie. The music was terrible, the scenes seemed alright, but the dialogue was just thrown together and the feeling was way off. Clay didn't do a line in the whole movie! They made him seem like a goody two shoes. Although, I gotta admit, it did provide some closure for me when he told off RIP THAT the book didn't do for me. That was a pretty good scene, he was intense and assertive. In the book, Clay was weak because he couldn't believe what he was seeing but, he never got up on his feet to do anything about it. He didn't care and, I think that is the point in the book. I really hope QT is an Bret Easton Ellis fan, and I hope he gets it right if the rumors are true.