GW BAILY (Harris) is MUCH BETTER THAN Art Metrano (Mauser)
-
-
wallacesawyer — 13 years ago(October 14, 2012 08:01 PM)
Nothing against Art, but I don't think Mauser was a very necessary character after the second film. He's a city cop, and suddenly having him running a rival police academy didn't seem right to me. Baily probably should've been in BACK IN TRAINING.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/ -
Sp119 — 13 years ago(October 15, 2012 07:57 AM)
I agree. Both men are talented, but continuity never seemed to be that important to the filmmakers (e.g. Proctor acting like the Blue Oyster was new to him when he & Harris visited there in Part 4, after Proctor had already been there in 3).
-
LightningLad — 13 years ago(March 25, 2013 03:52 PM)
I really like Mauser, partly due to sentimentality as I saw the second part first, and always remembered the shampoo/glue scene, and I like the reversal of it in 3. But Harris is just genius, he carries the movies he's in. In so many ways these guys are the real leads of the films, I think.
Move IT! Move IT! MOVE IT!
http://themortalcreeps.weebly.com/ -
stingingtail — 13 years ago(March 29, 2013 11:31 AM)
Harris is the antagonist of the movies. They are usually always the most memorable. I liked Mauser, but he didn't have any memorable quirks and traits like Harris with his swagger stick, his "Move it, move it, move it" and all that.
Harris is a legend.