2.7? come on folks.

[fgadmin]

ValerinAmberz — 20 years ago(September 08, 2005 07:53 PM)

I aggree wholeheartedly, if someone forced me to watch one single movie every day I'd pick this one ahead of any "quality" movie.
you have no respect for logicand I have no respect for those with no respect for logic.[/red]

[fgadmin]

dekion45 — 20 years ago(September 09, 2005 06:20 AM)

Dude! This movie lifts 40 minutes of footage from the orginal film! 2.7 is pretty generous. Do you seriously believe this movie deserves more than 2.7?

[fgadmin]

ValerinAmberz — 20 years ago(September 10, 2005 02:21 AM)

Okay as a SEQUEL it doesn't deserve more than 2.7, I aggree, but as a stand-alone movie it does (because you don't need to see the first movie) And I'm not talking about the quality of the filmmaking only about the level of entertainment. And this movie sucks so hard that it's priceless as someone else said on here. One of the funniest attempts of making a movie ever made.
you have no respect for logicand I have no respect for those with no respect for logic.[/red]

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

mrhysterium — 17 years ago(October 06, 2008 11:10 PM)

Likewise. I laughed all the way through this monstrosity! I enjoyed it but it is absolutely terrible, so I gave it a one!
-Brando-

[fgadmin]

RTheManF89 — 17 years ago(November 21, 2008 08:06 PM)

It's not that bad, imo, but far from my favorite (Part 4 is, fyi), mainly due to the flashbacks. So to put it simple, it's okay, but not great. 5/10.
I got the IVE tape at AudioVideo Plus last week for just $10. A trailer for Extreme Prejudice appears at the end.

[fgadmin]

fabyur51 — 17 years ago(November 23, 2008 08:45 AM)

I love this movie with every fibre of my being, but I gave it a one just to push it into the bottom 100 where it belongs and will get the recognition it deserves.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

darkbhudda — 17 years ago(December 21, 2008 07:40 AM)

This movie was awesome. The director was good, some great framing shots. But the best bit would have to be it raining after the umbrella opens.

[fgadmin]

Woodyanders — 16 years ago(December 25, 2009 07:58 AM)

I gave this film a 9 out of 10 for its sheer exquisitely awful high camp schlock value alone.
"We're all part Shatner/And part James Dean/Part Warren Oates/And Steven McQueen"

[fgadmin]

Doom — 11 years ago(February 12, 2015 05:51 AM)

3.4
now.
Wait a minute who am I here?

[fgadmin]

ElectricWarlock — 10 years ago(December 04, 2015 08:15 AM)

It's cheesy and campy but still fun and better than many other movies. I give it a 7/10.

[fgadmin]

kurt7825 — 10 years ago(December 27, 2015 07:05 PM)

bunch of beep idiots

[fgadmin]

Doom — 10 years ago(December 29, 2015 12:41 PM)

3.5
Wait a minute who am I here?

[fgadmin]

FlyingSaucersAreReal — 9 years ago(November 21, 2016 07:24 PM)

It's bad.
Padded out with clips from the first movie. The enjoyment it brings comes completely from laughing at its ineptitude.
-I was born in a crossfire hurricane.

[fgadmin]

Scarecrow-88 — 9 years ago(December 11, 2016 07:41 PM)

When your film is made up of so much footage and Freeman's performance doesn't give you giggles as much as cringe, then that is the reward, a low rating.