Superman V (1991)
-
jsl_99 — 12 years ago(July 12, 2013 02:14 AM)
I think Reeve returning for Superman V was briefly considered in the early 90s. The Salkinds had gotten the rights back to the Superman film series. They approached Reeve about playing the character one more time and he said he'd only be interested if they intended to make a quality film along the lines of the first two. When they couldn't give him that commitment he said no to the project.
-
bozo_500 — 12 years ago(October 12, 2013 02:47 AM)
see this:
http://www.imdb.com/board/10094074/board/flat/217770727 -
bozo_500 — 12 years ago(November 22, 2013 05:41 AM)
i guess IV was a sort of 're-launch' of sorts for the series - a belated sequel from another production company - sequels happened fairly fast back then - not so much 4 years so it was sort of a relaunch with the intention of more sequels which didnt happen (so abit like Superman Returns actually)
just imagine if SIV had been a hit despite the production problems, and made similar to SIII (which was still a hit) or even better
Cannon probably wouldve fast tracked a Superman V & VI back to back for 1989/90 BTTF style (wed have 2 Reeve Superman trilogys sitting on our shelves now - the Salkind trilogy and the Cannon trilogy) maybe even leading to a Burton/Keaton/Reeve Batman/Superman movie (after Batman Returns instead of 'Forever')
if only IV had been a damn hit! -
TMC-4 — 9 years ago(July 12, 2016 12:57 AM)
Here's what Christopher Reeve himself said of a possible
Superman V
:
http://haphazardstuff.com/Superman4
(go to the 39:53 mark). -
BoSoxRules — 9 years ago(August 24, 2016 12:15 PM)
"They approached Reeve about playing the character one more time and he said he'd only be interested if they intended to make a quality film along the lines of the first two. When they couldn't give him that commitment he said no to the project."
How did they respond? "Sorry, Chris, we want another one along the lines of Superman III." -
TMC-4 — 9 years ago(September 07, 2016 11:05 PM)
I sometimes wonder had Christopher Reeve not gotten into his accident, would it still been possible for him to play Superman at least one more time? I mean Reeve was I think, only in his early 40s when he had his accident and still seemed to look convincing enough (assuming that he kept himself in the best shape possible) to still play the Man of Steel.
I'm sure that Warner Bros. after having great success (at the time) with their Batman series, the had their sights set on ultimately "restoring" the luster of DC Comics' other big superhero. I know that Reeve said that the Salkinds managed to get back the rights to make Superman movies, which was an optimistic sign because it wouldn't be a cheap looking schlock-fest like under Cannon. I'm guessing that once Warner Bros. managed to get full rights to Superman back (this is the big reason why the
Superboy
TV series had to go off the air in favor of
Lois & Clark
), anything tied to the Salkinds had to be swept under the rug. -
wallacesawyer — 12 years ago(February 01, 2014 07:50 PM)
All I know is if 4 had been a hit, Cannon would've recycled a lot of its deleted scenes and wrote new material around it for a SUPERMAN 5 with Reeve in the director's chair. Think TRAIL OF THE PINK PANTHER.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/ -
bozo_500 — 11 years ago(July 08, 2014 05:33 PM)
even though itd have been terrible (even worse than IV) and used the deleted footage from IV etc id still have preferred there to have been a Cannon Superman V
it probably would've had to go STVHS though:
http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2012/298/0/6/superman_v_first_releas e_dvd_cover_by_stick_man_11-d5iw5rq.jpg -
wallacesawyer — 10 years ago(September 02, 2015 06:49 PM)
even though itd have been terrible (even worse than IV) and used the deleted footage from IV etc id still have preferred there to have been a Cannon Superman V
I am a fan of Cannon, and as bad as it may have been, I too would have liked to see it.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/ -
Hendry_William_French — 11 years ago(July 08, 2014 06:57 PM)
Are you saying they would've made Superman V darker based off the back of the huge success of the 89 Batman movie? If so, you'd be right since a camp Superman movie in 91 would've been rejected so they'd have to use a different set up. Superhero/comic book movies of the early 90s had all become different in tone like Darkman, Dick Tracy, Robocop 2, tmnt (1990) and Batman Returns so a new Superman would've had to have gone their route if it was to catch on.
I just don't think that set up would work. Superman worked because it was a bright, euphorically upbeat and camp movie series about an all American hero. Darkening it up would make it lose all its charm and fun.
Water, my ass! Bring this guy some pepto bismol! -
bozo_500 — 11 years ago(July 09, 2014 07:31 AM)
Yeah I see your point about the change in tone. Maybe if it had been Superman going to Gotham it couldve worked - Batman v Superman in 1995 instead of Batman Forever:
http://www.imdb.com/board/10094074/board/flat/217770727 -
bozo_500 — 11 years ago(August 02, 2014 01:56 AM)
someone should adapt whatever screenplay was out there for Reeve's 5th film into a 5 part comic series set in 1990 (complete with Crystal font Movie Poster style covers, and using the likenesses of Reeve, Kidder, Cooper, Hackman, McClure with cameos from Jor El, Lana, Zod and the villains in jail, even Gus Gorman! could even work in a Batman Keaton cameo)itd be cool for something like that to take away the nasty taste left by Superman IV - like Rocky Balboa did after Rocky Vthey could use elements of whatever was going to be the proposed script for V in 1990 or whenever it wasand could do stuff that theyd have never been able to do e.g. Brando as Jor El. (Thats what I thought Donners Last Son would be but instead it turned out to be some sort of reboot of SII with elements of SR)
Also maybe Singer and his two SR writers could do a sequel to SR with the likeness of the SR cast (like they did the 4 prequel issues which were alittle bit like an adaptation of Superman I) and there could even be Burtons Superman Lives
And they could also do comics for I and II and do the whole thing as Donner originally envisioned (itd be more interesting for it to differ with the onscreen versions anyway). A comic with the time travel at the end of II (as originally intended when filming began on I/II)or as it wouldve been done had Donner finished directing II in 1980 - with the time travel at the end of STM and coming up with something else for the end of II perhaps not the memory kiss. its not impossible they will do I&II eventually. Esp since I&II never got comic adaptations like III/IV (IDW did Star Trek II TWOK and i never thought that would happen)
and doing different interpretations of classic stuff is happening now and then in comics (Lucas' original SW concept, Treks original Harlan Ellison City on the Edge, the lost AWest Batman episode featuring Two Face)
maybe could go even further and give us what Donner had in mind for a third movie (like the Geoff Jones/Donner Last Son comics which im sure was originally mooted as Donners 'III') -
freezedawg98 — 11 years ago(August 12, 2014 10:24 AM)
I doubt they could have gotten Reeve back for a Superman V. I remember seeing him being interviewed by Larry King around 1990 and when the topic of a Superman V came up, he mentioned that a fifth movie had been discussed and would have had an environmental message behind it (ultimately scrapped by Cannon). But, he sounded detached from the series when Larry asked about the third and fourth films. I've also heard that he didn't care for how Cannon's production on the the fourth film was executed. I'm assuming he would mean the budget and effects (which were the biggest issues). Also, the Salkinds burned a lot of bridges with the original cast during the 2nd film.