What was so wrong with Daryl Hannah's performance?
-
johnston.scot — 12 years ago(October 07, 2013 01:53 PM)
I actually thought she was okay in this movie. She's a pretty bad actress, but her character is, fundamentally, a bad actress. So it works.
On the other hand: would a better actress have made the part more interesting? Yeah, probably. -
cookiela2001 — 12 years ago(January 09, 2014 10:54 AM)
The character is very badly drawn, in the first place. It's like she has absolutely no reason to be there except to give the lead a romantic interest.
Daryl Hannah has a sort of flat tone in her voice here that lacks conviction, but it really means the director didn't convey anything to her as to what approach to use. And what could he say: the part's very floaty and worthless. -
johnston.scot — 9 years ago(August 16, 2016 04:18 PM)
It's a thin part, and doesn't really carry enough weight to be a romantic lead.
The only function of the part, at least in the finished film, is to be a rather broad parody of a certain type of facile sophisticate. The part does bear on the primary storyline, somewhat, in that Bud's being taken in by her pretensions is consistent with his lack of any basic judgment.
There's no real emotional content to the part, though. I wonder if the original conception was more meaty, and it wound up the way it did due to Hannah's limitations (perhaps combined with other things: like Stone's ultimate lack of interest in that side of Bud). -
cookiela2001 — 9 years ago(September 15, 2016 10:48 AM)
The part might have been written to balance and comment in some way with Sean Young's character as Gordon's wifebut then that actress pissed everyone off on the set, was fired, and her scenes cut.
(Oliver Stone's never been particularly good with female characters, anyway.)
. -
criztu — 11 years ago(May 11, 2014 07:26 AM)
I was wondering why would she be cast as the love interest of Bud, seeing how bad she looked in every aspect - her masculine face and boyish body, her fvcked up hair, her crappy "art", everything about her character screamed grotesque.
But then Gecko tells Bud, as he shows him a crappy painting with a brown stain on a vomit green background "look at this art piece, i bought it for $60 000, and now i could sell it for $600 000 it's an illusion, and money make it real, and the more real it becomes, the more people want it".
And then I remembered he says the same thing about Darien, the fvcker sold her to Bud with something like "she's the best money can buy, when you'll have more money you can have this beauty".
But then, in the meting with the union guys, Geko puts his plate on the table, but it falls, as there was no table, it was some crappy art piece brought in by Darien. She decorated Bud's house with a mix of pharaonic lavishness and homeless decrepitude, nothing short of strident insanity.
So yeah, in the end, I think she's supposed to be an impostor, a hollow illusion, and give that sh!tty vibe - Bud seduced by a sh!tty entity. The thing is, she looked and sounded fvckin terrible, but I've seen her in Bladerunner, and she looked fascinating there. So yeah, I think Stone cast her as some kind of a dead shell of a human being, a gangrened artist. -
ldarrisa-1 — 11 years ago(May 25, 2014 07:35 AM)
all the women in this movie looked like menwas that an 80's thing??! The blonde in the car, Daryll Hannah, the only bonkable woman (in my opinion) was his mother!! surely Gekko could've afforded a better looking womanand the scene when they were at the beach and she comes out of the surf- in a wetsuit!! are you kidding me??! what a missed opportunity!! If you can't do the James Bond girl in a bikini, then why have a beach scene in the first place??!
-
smoko — 11 years ago(December 19, 2014 01:32 AM)
@ldarrisa-1 What's strange is that both Daryl Hannah and Sean Young (Kate Gekko) were in
Blade Runner
, and in that movie they looked terrific. Sean Young looks atrocious in this movie.
As for Bud's mother, wasn't she the only woman in the movie who wasn't soulless? -
thephoenixxx — 9 years ago(August 15, 2016 06:22 PM)
all the women in this movie looked like menwas that an 80's thing??!
I always think the same thing whenever I watch this movie. The women all look so masculine. I'm sure the huge 80s shoulder pads didn't help. That outfit Daryll Hannah is wearing when she and Bud break up is one of the ugliest things I've ever seen. She looks like she's wearing a footballer's uniform under that suit. -
Paul_Ke — 11 years ago(October 21, 2014 09:15 AM)
Daryl Hannah is a beautiful woman, and I like her acting in most movies, but not in this one. She was unconvincing as a snobby socialite. But I still think Oliver Stone was correct in casting her, because I hate it when they cast women in roles of highly desirable women with actresses who aren't all that great looking (even though they are decent actresses). I think you've got to cast a beautiful woman in this role, even if she sucks at acting, to make me believe Bud would take the risks he did for the "good" life.
-
seahawk3133 — 11 years ago(December 10, 2014 10:06 AM)
I felt like her character was perfect for what the film was portraying.
The concept was greed makes you soulless & without emotion and that was Darryl's character. Only a person without a soul would want a woman like that. She left his life when he got his soul back -
roddick-1 — 10 years ago(July 26, 2015 05:24 PM)
I think everyone goes too hard on ol' Darrien!
She has an important part in the movie. She is the most important material item Bud wants to acquire with his newfound wealth. I don't find Daryl Hannah particularly attractive, but she's just the type of girl Bud would like and use as another symbol of his success.
When I first watched the movie I hated her, especially for ditching Bud when he turned on Gekko. But after watching it again you can see she really has feelings for Bud, just not enough to give all she's worked for up to stay with him. -
Naughty-God — 10 years ago(September 17, 2015 07:34 PM)
She was never a great actress and it could be argued that her only true skill was on the casting couch (offscreen) which would explain her agent's ability to get her significant roles in A-lister movies.
Some of the previous comments on this thread speak to the Darrien character as the personification of 80s greed, maybe so, but they could have cast a more compelling actress to pull off a more convincing seduction of Budd Fox.