Keaton Deserved An Oscar
-
-
jleslie48 — 19 years ago(January 21, 2007 06:31 AM)
holy cow! dustin hoffman/ rain man won that year?
over keatons performance in this movie???
that is a crime.
keaton is IMO the single most under-rated actor in Hollywood.
he can do it all, funny, serious, drama, good-guy, bad-guy, whatever. -
tklaurent — 19 years ago(February 09, 2007 09:07 PM)
The crime here is he didn't even get a nomination. Underrated actor definitely. That speech at the end is one of the most memorable that I've ever seen. Proud to say that I seen this in the theater opening weekend.
-
Oliver-50 — 19 years ago(March 17, 2007 11:50 AM)
I totally agree that Keaton deserved an Oscar for this. If there is any doubt about a win then he at least deserved a nomination. This was one of the most realistic depictions of drug abuse that I've seen. The movie itself doesn't hold up all the way until the end, but Keaton is brilliant.
Gandhi baked is good. -
WeponX — 17 years ago(December 18, 2008 02:41 PM)
Keaton was brilliant in this film. Likely the reason he was overlooked is because the film was somewhat average. Still a great film, but unfortunately great acting in a relatively good, but average film doesn't get as much Oscar attention as it usually deserves. Oscar or not, this film was none the less monumental in Keaton's career because it established him as someone who was more than a comedian. I think this film really was the birth of Keaton's career as an actor, and not just a comedian.
George Bush smokes Alabama Kusch. -
MurderInc2014 — 17 years ago(December 27, 2008 07:43 PM)
But this film got relatively positive reviews when it came out and, along with Keaton, Kathy Baker's and Morgan Freeman's performances were both hailed. I think the reason Keaton didn't get an Oscar nod was because the film didn't exactly set the box office on fire. If this movie would have been released post-internet/instant media/pc age, it would have garnered more word-of-mouth publicity and more people would have heard about it and seen it. Look what's going on with "The Wrestler". The same type of low budget/"small" film has gotten a lot of attention and Oscar's notice simply from the internet. I heard about 'The Wrestler" and Mickey Rourke's highly touted performance in it 6 months before it was even given a limited release. In 1988, if you didn't see Clean and Sober's listing in the theater section of the local paper, you probably didn't even know it was out. There was very little promotion for it on tv or in the trades.
-
blameline — 17 years ago(January 07, 2009 01:33 PM)
Excellent point Todd. That's why the AMPAS is all political. They throw the honors on those who are in favor of creating big BO receipts. The last time I saw a travesty of this nature was in 1982-when Local Hero was overlooked for nearly everything it could have been nominated for. We'll see it again in the future. Great Acting + low Box Office = No nomination. Lousy acting + big Box Office = Who cares?
Next thing they'll be breeding us like cattle. You've gotta tell them. SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE! -
WeponX — 17 years ago(January 25, 2009 04:02 PM)
Keaton did deserve an Oscar for this role without a doubt. As Siskel and Ebert said in their review of this film, they've seen a lot of actors pull the whole roll out of bed and act like a junkie routine, but with Michael Keaton you could truly believe it. The judges don't even have to see films to vote on them so that may be why he was overlooked and didn't even get a nomination. They can vote off of buzz and hype, and I imagine this film wasn't exactly a box office blockbuster.
George Bush smokes Alabama Kusch.