Jamie Lee Curtis attractive?
-
Pimptaddyone — 18 years ago(December 21, 2007 07:49 PM)
This is hilarious! At least 90% of males will never get a girl that is as attractive as Curtis was in this film. Her body was hot! I see Internet dorks claiming Scarlett is not attractive, and saying Uma was ugly. Seriously, I was unaware that nerds who posted on IMDB pulled woman that make Scarlett look ugly. This is truly amazing! It must be the post count or the flaming on the Narnia board that makes them want the nerds.
P.S. 99% of the people on this site would kill to get Scarlett, or Jamie Lee in this film. I was unaware beggars were now choosers. -
Kintanti — 18 years ago(January 27, 2008 01:58 PM)
Yeah, it's funny. But I think the original poster cribbed it from Peter Griffin in the "The Family Guy" when he says that Sarah Jessica Parker (I believe) "looks like a foot." But, like I said, even if the original poster "borrowed" the line, it's still funny.
-
marousha_n — 12 years ago(January 16, 2014 02:57 AM)
The fact the you can compare Jamie Lee Curtis to that horse can mean one thing: you're either blind or blind. You have no clue what sexy means. Also, as someone previously said, you would probably kill to have a woman looking half as good as she does.
All time favorites
http://www.imdb.com/list/uXvt09u3fO4/ -
crchadwick — 18 years ago(March 26, 2008 07:14 PM)
She's not conventionally beautiful, but very attractive in this film, partly due to her charisma and the sexy, confident way she carries herself. As somebody else said earlier in the thread, a lot of young actresses look great, but have no charisma and give bland performances. Not so with Jamie
Also, I LOVE the way she dresses in A Fish Called Wanda. Those high-waisted jeans and dresses with shoulder pads so 80s and so flattering for her shape mmm mmm.
Of course they've brought forth juniper berries, they're juniper bushes! -
lostto — 16 years ago(November 14, 2009 03:31 AM)
yikesthose 80's fashions were horrible. By far the worst decade for style in the 20th century, or even the millenium. Shapeless, mid-calf over-full skirts, flats with pale nylons and shoulder pads flattered NOBODY's shape. I'm so relieved I spent that decade in scrubs and jeans, and so don't have to see pics of myself in that odious attiremakes me shudder. Beauty is in the eye
-
bron-tay — 15 years ago(February 15, 2011 10:22 PM)
Her wardrobe was rather bizarre even by contemporary standards. The scene with the blonde curly wig and big yellow smock-dress? wtf? (In fact, I think her wardrobe deserves its own thread.)
Think cynical thoughts. -
LadyDi4476 — 10 years ago(September 25, 2015 06:31 AM)
She doesn't have the most beautiful or feminine face (the short hair doesn't help), but she has a very sexy body in this movie. I agree with whoever said she looked hot wearing the black bra and panties. She has massive sex appeal without being movie star gorgeous.
-Di -
Wxlfgang — 17 years ago(June 02, 2008 10:25 AM)
I agree with you - I don't find Curtis all that great looking either. "Meh" comes to mind. I don't mind her, but she just doesnt do anything for me. Where she makes up for that is her acting which is quite good. I don't know of an actress who could pull off Arnold's wife role in True Lies for instance. She's kinda a geek but with personality.
