The most over rated trilogy in the history of film
-
ralph_2ndedition — 9 years ago(January 21, 2017 01:55 PM)
Wouldn't agree that it's the "most overrated trilogy", but it IS very uneven.
The first film is more or less flawless. It's a benchmark for how adventure films should be made. It makes any other action movie look like it is running in slow motion.
The second swings wildly back and forth between ludicrous attempts at embarrasing humor and pitch black darkness and horror. It has moments of unforgettable genius, but the end result is passable at best.
This one, the third one, is slightly better, only because it is more even. It still has a quite a few cringe worthy moments though, that takes me as the viewer out of the story.
I do like this trilogy though, I have it and I have seen it many times. But I can easily think of 5-6 other trilogy's that is infinately better.
(The fourth film in this series is best not talked about at all!) -
TheFearmakers — 9 years ago(January 21, 2017 07:56 PM)
Well this is the Johnny Depp generation. If he aint in a movie, it jsut aint no darn good.
Raiders is actually underrated being it's hindered by two lousy sequels. It was made up for slightly with this cool entry but
Oh by the way, Overrated it one word.
Here, I'll use it in a sentence:
Saying things are overrated is overrated.
