Was Riggs supposed to die at the end? (possible spoilers)
-
jrock310 — 11 years ago(July 22, 2014 11:55 AM)
I can respect thatI just felt that after 2, it got too corny. A lot of the humor was forced. The only thing I loved about 4 was Jet Li. Hated Chris Rock (he needs to stick to stand up comedy, he cants act for shyte). He ruined it for me.
3 was better than 4, but 1&2 were the best. -
Kyumonryu — 11 years ago(March 23, 2015 02:13 AM)
It made perfect sense to kill McAllister first, then Joshua.
McAllister was a bitch, oshua was built up to be a badass like Riggs, everybody could see it right from the beginning that they were destined to fight the final bout in the movie.
but they hung him anyway.
Hanged, Ami. Your father was not a tapestry. -
dodonpachisdoj — 9 years ago(September 22, 2016 06:49 AM)
Well, in action movies and video games, I always preferred having the henchman go down first, then kill the main bad guy. I know some James Bond movies that had the henchman as the final enemy of the movie.
-
simian_ninja — 9 years ago(September 22, 2016 06:11 AM)
Yeah, well known rumour.
I kind of think Riggs should have died in Lethal Weapon 4. Better character arc. As soon as he seems to have everything settled down and his family life is beginning, bam, he meets another lethal weapon that can take him down.
Death is the standard breach for a complex prize.