why the low score?
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Three Men and a Little Lady
bubbles17 — 20 years ago(June 24, 2005 11:00 AM)
k, maybe it was just me, but i loved this movie! this was one of the very rare sequels (sp? sorry) that i like better than the first one! was i the only person that actually liked this movie? lol
-
Stan21 — 20 years ago(February 09, 2006 12:28 AM)
This movie got a low score because there was no "ghost" for which to idioticaly, though hilariously, post moronic threads in the boards concerning whether or not the "ghost" existed and the humurous arguments that ensue after the aforementioned posts are made.
-
athena_84 — 20 years ago(February 19, 2006 05:23 PM)
You aren't the only person who liked this film - I love it and so does one of my housemates. We watched it today and we both agreed that it was a film that left you feeling warm and fuzzy inside!
As for the low score - I have no idea but I dont tend to vote (perhaps I should) and I guess not many other people who like this film vote either!? -
Iovejustis — 19 years ago(November 21, 2006 08:17 AM)
I LOVE this movie! I completely agree that it is one of very few I can actually remember liking more than the first installment. To this day I can sit through it in entirety and be commpletely entertained. Not too mention it had been the first time I heard "Waiting for a Star to Fall" by Boy Meets Girl(It plays as they're leaving the Chapel) which is now my favorite song of all time. =D
-
adampearce96 — 15 years ago(October 07, 2010 01:05 PM)
First off: I'm British and gave it a 10.
The main problem people seem to have is the British stereotypes (i actually thought it was one of the few that let us off easy and congratulate them for it) there was the "vitimins" and the mini, i laughed at those, Ted Danson's portrayal of the priest was brilliant. I love the film, and for some reason others don't. Sorry icouldn't explain. -
scabab — 15 years ago(February 11, 2011 07:15 PM)
Also British but id give it a 4. I really enjoyed the first i gave i a 7. But this one was a little too silly, very cliche and the second half in Britain was horrible. I cant stand these monarchy stereotypical snobs. Any American film that involves Britain involves them.
It was passable until they went to Britain. -
cobhatecrew09 — 15 years ago(April 01, 2011 12:37 PM)
i did think it would get a better score than that. ok its no masterpiece , but a dam good comedy. id give it an average 6/10 . i am surprised the first one got a higher score , as i think this is one of the very rare instances that a sequel outdoes the first movie.