A really bad movie
-
bastets_kitten — 18 years ago(January 17, 2008 11:35 AM)
I would have to agree with you. I first saw this movie as a kid, and even then I knew it was crap. The acting was horrible, the plot was stupid, and it didn't carry forward any of the magic from the first movie. I've read the book too, and I think that the second part of the book really detracts from the first part. Flame me all you want, but the second half of the book stunk.
-
cinematic_randomness — 14 years ago(November 13, 2011 03:11 PM)
I saw the movie at the cinema when I was 6 years old and like you bastets_kitten I also thought it was crap, even at that age. It's an absolute mess of a film that's disturbingly weird and has something very off about it. Also I think it's very evident that it tries too hard to recapture the magic that made the original work so well.
"Ahh, it's great to be young and insane" - Michael Keaton
The Dream Team -
reaseltbim — 12 years ago(January 01, 2014 02:54 PM)
I also saw this when I was young and I remember being troubled by how the quality dropped so much from the first one. So MUCH.
The thing I hated the most is how, the first one takes itself very seriously and their problems are very real. It's a very dramatic movie. not any comedy, it is a real dramatic fantasy movie. with real dangers.
This one feels like a parody of the first one. Like someone was making a parody movie or something. This one was full of dumb moments and slapstick jokes. Which did not belong here.
The second movie doesn't take itself seriously and doesn't take the story seriously. Which is really bad considering how important the first one took it's own story.
This one feels like if they made a morning cartoon based on the Neverending story full of silly and dumb things. (but with real people of course) -
jcshetler — 12 years ago(December 11, 2013 03:55 PM)
awful.
The Dumbing-Down of America
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumbing_down -
Starduster — 9 years ago(September 05, 2016 12:54 AM)
As I read all of the negative posts here, all of them make me think of the third UNWATCHABLE installment.
i am not trying to imply that the second one wasn't inferior to the first one. It was. HOWEVER if you TRULY want to see a BAD movie, watch the third one. I dont recommend it by any means, but it lets you know how TRULY BAD a movie can be.
I think that in a successful movie like the first one, the actors define who the characters are. to ME, it is tough, if not impossible to make changes to 3 young actors who defined their roles; and make the replacements believable.
I admit that I didn't like the second installment as much, but when I saw the sickening attempt to introduce a third chapter, I came to appreciate the second one a lot more. At least it was based on the book. Im just sorry that it was not possible to make a second chapter with the original cast but of course with young actors, they quickly can outgrow their parts and this was done many years later. In a perfect world it would have been nice to make bot movie installments at the the same time but there was no budget for that and no guarantee on how much money would be made by each movie. I'm sure there were other constraints as well.
The first one has stood the test of time, even withe its shortcomings. The second one completes the other half of the book. it SHOULD have ended there. The third one is just a reminder that the second one wasn't all that bad after all.